18 Jan 08
I just finished this 3-0 blitz - I thought it was a pretty awesome game, pure domination from the very beginning:
[Event "Rated game, 3m + 0s"]
[Site "Main Playing Hall"]
[Date "2008.01.17"]
[Round "?"]
[White "CMSMaster"]
[Black "Pritzesa"]
[Result "1-0"]
[WhiteElo "1438"]
[PlyCount "57"]
[EventDate "2008.01.17"]
[TimeControl "180"]
1. d4 {1} d5 {0} 2. c4 {1} dxc4 {1} 3. e4 {1} c6 {1} 4. Bxc4 {3} Nf6 {1} 5. Nc3
{2} e6 {1} 6. Nf3 {2} Bb4 {2} 7. Bd3 {6} Bxc3+ {1} 8. bxc3 {1} Nbd7 {1} 9. O-O
{2} O-O {2} 10. Qc2 {1} Re8 {2} 11. e5 {1} Nd5 {2} 12. Bxh7+ {1} Kh8 {0} 13.
Be4 {2} g6 {4} 14. Bxg6 {5} fxg6 {3} 15. Qxg6 {1} Qe7 {10} 16. Ng5 {9} Nf8 {6}
17. Nf7+ {7} Qxf7 {15} 18. Qxf7 {1} Bd7 {4} 19. Bh6 {3} Re7 {13} 20. Qh5 {14}
Nh7 {5} 21. Bg5 {10} Rf7 {8} 22. Qxf7 {9} Be8 {8} 23. Qxe6 {10} Bg6 {2} 24.
Bf6+ {9} Nhxf6 {3} 25. exf6 {1} Rf8 {6} 26. Qh3+ {5} Kg8 {2} 27. Qe6+ {5} Bf7 {
1} 28. Qg4+ {1} Kh7 {3} 29. Qg7# {(Lag: Av=1.23s, max=2.3s) 1} 1-0
18 Jan 08
1 edit
Originally posted by cmsMasterBlitz games are meaningless and have no significant value other than the false pretense of boosting the winner's ego.
I just finished this 3-0 blitz - I thought it was a pretty awesome game, pure domination from the very beginning:
[Event "Rated game, 3m + 0s"]
[Site "Main Playing Hall"]
[Date "2008.01.17"]
[Round "?"]
[White "CMSMaster"]
[Black "Pritzesa"]
[Result "1-0"]
[WhiteElo "1438"]
[PlyCount "57"]
[EventDate "2008.01.17"]
[TimeControl "180"]
1. d4 ...[text shortened]... Bf7 {
1} 28. Qg4+ {1} Kh7 {3} 29. Qg7# {(Lag: Av=1.23s, max=2.3s) 1} 1-0
18 Jan 08
Originally posted by ArrakisThats a bit harsh...and as usual with absolutes...absolutely wrong. I know people that play blitz very accurately...maybe even at a higher level than you play cc.
Blitz games are meaningless and have no significant value other than the false pretense of boosting the winner's ego.
18 Jan 08
1 edit
Originally posted by ArrakisThanks for not adding anything to the conversation.
Blitz games are meaningless and have no significant value other than the false pretense of boosting the winner's ego.
BTW: If you looked at the game you might find it entertaining...which is the point of this thread.
18 Jan 08
Originally posted by cmsMasterVery nice game. You attacked pretty agressive 🙂 I am just curious, why 7. Bd3... Wouldn't Qc2 or Qe2 be better way for adding extra support to e4 pawn?
I just finished this 3-0 blitz - I thought it was a pretty awesome game, pure domination from the very beginning:
[Event "Rated game, 3m + 0s"]
[Site "Main Playing Hall"]
[Date "2008.01.17"]
[Round "?"]
[White "CMSMaster"]
[Black "Pritzesa"]
[Result "1-0"]
[WhiteElo "1438"]
[PlyCount "57"]
[EventDate "2008.01.17"]
[TimeControl "180"]
1. d4 ...[text shortened]... Bf7 {
1} 28. Qg4+ {1} Kh7 {3} 29. Qg7# {(Lag: Av=1.23s, max=2.3s) 1} 1-0
18 Jan 08
Originally posted by ivan2908Yeah, probably, but I planned on having the queen on c2 and bishop on d3 anyhow, as that's my typical setup that I prefer - so I figured it didn't matter too much if I played Qc2 or Bd3 first.
Very nice game. You attacked pretty agressive 🙂 I am just curious, why 7. Bd3... Wouldn't Qc2 or Qe2 be better way for adding extra support to e4 pawn?
18 Jan 08
Originally posted by cmsMaster11. e5 removing defender. My favorite tactical device, it can really produce butterfly-hurricane effect. I remember Chessmaster tutorial with removing defender of defenders defender, resulting in winning game. Tactics, tactics, tactics 😛 Well done!
Yeah, probably, but I planned on having the queen on c2 and bishop on d3 anyhow, as that's my typical setup that I prefer - so I figured it didn't matter too much if I played Qc2 or Bd3 first.
18 Jan 08
Originally posted by tomtom232Talking about me?
Thats a bit harsh...and as usual with absolutes...absolutely wrong. I know people that play blitz very accurately...maybe even at a higher level than you play cc.
I play much better in blitz. For some reason it's harder for me to play cc. Maybe because I got to refresh my mind on what's going on in the game everytime I come back to it
18 Jan 08
1 edit
Originally posted by cmsMasterPlease, excuse me for a naïve question...
1. d4 {1} d5 {0} 2. c4 {1} dxc4 {1} 3. e4 {1} c6 {1} 4. Bxc4 {3} Nf6 {1} 5. Nc3
{2} e6 {1} 6. Nf3 {2} Bb4 {2} 7. Bd3 {6} Bxc3+ {1} 8. bxc3 {1} Nbd7 {1} 9. O-O
{2} O-O {2} 10. Qc2 {1} Re8 {2} 11. e5 {1} Nd5 {2} 12. Bxh7+ {1} Kh8 {0} 13.
Be4 {2} g6 {4} 14. Bxg6 {5} fxg6 {3} 15. Qxg6 {1} Qe7 {10} 16. Ng5 {9} Nf8 {6}
17. Nf7+ {7} Qxf7 {15} 18. Qxf7 {1} Bd7 ...[text shortened]... } Kg8 {2} 27. Qe6+ {5} Bf7 {
1} 28. Qg4+ {1} Kh7 {3} 29. Qg7# {(Lag: Av=1.23s, max=2.3s) 1} 1-0
What does {1}, {0}, {6}, mean?
What program generate this kind of PGNs?
18 Jan 08
3 edits
Originally posted by wittywonkanope...its lag time...its the seconds it took between when the move made and when it shows on the opponents screen
I won't swear by it, but I think it shows how long (in seconds) that player took to make that move.
EDIT: or your screen if the opponent moved.
EDIT2: Maybe you are right...I haven't played at playchess for a while
19 Jan 08
Originally posted by tomtom232Doesn't it say the max lag time is 2.3 secs?
nope...its lag time...its the seconds it took between when the move made and when it shows on the opponents screen
EDIT: or your screen if the opponent moved.
EDIT2: Maybe you are right...I haven't played at playchess for a while