04 May 06
Originally posted by powershakerThe game isn't very interesting because your opponent defended poorly. Even before the sacrifice, he should repeat the position with ...Qd8 instead of ...Rc7? which is a pointless move.
This was a very crystal clear rook sacrifice for a position. I hope people like it. I'm rather proud of this little gem. My opponent just resigned today. Of course his rating wasn't that high, but I think the game has a classical beauty to it, and a tinge of Tal somewhere I feel. Only, Tal's sacrifices were often much deeper. 🙂 Game 1770026
04 May 06
Originally posted by powershakerAnalyse this game? OK - here goes.
This was a very crystal clear rook sacrifice for a position. I hope people like it. I'm rather proud of this little gem. My opponent just resigned today. Of course his rating wasn't that high, but I think the game has a classical beauty to it, and a tinge of Tal somewhere I feel. Only, Tal's sacrifices were often much deeper. 🙂 Game 1770026
5...........a5. Wastes time. Better is Nf6 or Qb6
8 N xc6 weak. Strengthens blacks centre. Better is 0-0 or Be3
11..........d5 or e5 would leave black at least equal
12..........Ba6. Bad. Nb6 or e5 would leave black equal
14...........Again - d5 or Nf6 leave black better
16 f4?Better Be3 or Ra-d1
18...........Q b6+ followed by Q x b2 would win
19 ..........R e7 is ugly but holds temporarily
20 ..........R a7 pointless
22 B g5? h5 should hold for black
22 B h6? Q d8 should hold
23 R x h7? B d4+ followed by Ne5 would hold for black
You should have played Q h3 or Q f3.
Can't see much beauty there myself I'm afraid. Sorry to be a party pooper
04 May 06
1 edit
Originally posted by JusuhThank you! I appreciate the compliment. After all, I'm usually taking punches most of the time, and a compliment is well appreciated. 🙂 I followed all the lines, even Nf8 for Black. Even then, a mate is inevitable. I did think the game showed exactly how the position - looking very innocent at first - could develop if proper psychic force was used. I think the rook sac was the only way in MY game.
you gotta be kidding. really.
but well played anyway...
04 May 06
Originally posted by KirwanActually, Fritz says mate is inevitable if accepts or denies the sac.
Analyse this game? OK - here goes.
5...........a5. Wastes time. Better is Nf6 or Qb6
8 N xc6 weak. Strengthens blacks centre. Better is 0-0 or Be3
11..........d5 or e5 would leave black at least equal
12..........Ba6. Bad. Nb6 or e5 would leave black equal
14...........Again - d5 or Nf6 leave black better
16 f4?Better Be3 or Ra-d1
18...........Q b6+ f ...[text shortened]... layed Q h3 or Q f3.
Can't see much beauty there myself I'm afraid. Sorry to be a party pooper
04 May 06
Originally posted by KirwanAnyway, if it goes deeper, I wonder if Fritz would say what? I believe the whole point of this sac wasn't whether it was the PERFECT move. But, it was rather the deeper psychological blows since I was playing a 1300-1400 player. The best move isn't always the best move. Lasker knew it, and I felt the rook sac was a psychic blow at this point.
Analyse this game? OK - here goes.
5...........a5. Wastes time. Better is Nf6 or Qb6
8 N xc6 weak. Strengthens blacks centre. Better is 0-0 or Be3
11..........d5 or e5 would leave black at least equal
12..........Ba6. Bad. Nb6 or e5 would leave black equal
14...........Again - d5 or Nf6 leave black better
16 f4?Better Be3 or Ra-d1
18...........Q b6+ f ...[text shortened]... layed Q h3 or Q f3.
Can't see much beauty there myself I'm afraid. Sorry to be a party pooper
05 May 06
At that point you had a won game so it doesn't really matter. However, your opponent clearly doesn't understand his opening. In almost all variations of the sicillain blacks dream is to play d5 with equality (or even an advantage). With Nxf6 you gift wrapped this and by having your bishop on c4 he can play it with tempo! Instead, he moves his knight away from the kingside (where you are building up your forces) then prceeds to play e5 (which doesn't seem to improve his position at all).
In essense, I see a game with one person significantly stronger than the other (200-300 points perhaps?) and the game bearing that out.
05 May 06
Originally posted by KirwanActually, my Fritz agrees with yours. It claims Rxh7? is a poor move, and gives ...Bd4+ as the best possible refutation, and Qh3/f3 as the proper alternatives.
WTF I'm reading a post asking for analysis. It mentions psychic powers and Tal-like sacrafices.
Please just correct me and show me how R x h7 leads to mate