Originally posted by wolfgang59I'm retarded? And you can't understand me! That's retarded.
Apathist: I want to talk about how to improve our system. What ideas do you have.
josephw: Theocracy
wolfgang59: Whose - and in what way would it improve the system?
josephw: ... Wrong word ..... It wouldn't
What sort of idiot are you?
I was asking for whose theocracy. The theocracy of Ancient Egypt? What?
And in rep ...[text shortened]... uldn't"!
(After replying to a post on how to improve the system!)
You are severely retarded.
What's your problem? I didn't say anything that should cause you to spew vitriol and call me retarded. You're allowing yourself to come unhinged over a simple statement you're apparently unwilling to comprehend.
It's not a question of "whose" theocracy. A theocracy isn't man made. Otherwise it wouldn't be a theocracy. And a theocracy wouldn't "improve" a man made system of government. It would replace it altogether.
If you don't agree with my rationale, then argue against it. Calling me retarded only makes you look stupid.
Originally posted by josephwCountries that designate themselves "Islamic States" like Pakistan and Iran are theocracies. Are you really claiming "a theocracy isn't man made"?
It's not a question of "whose" theocracy. A theocracy isn't man made. Otherwise it wouldn't be a theocracy. And a theocracy wouldn't "improve" a man made system of government. It would replace it altogether.
Originally posted by josephwI'd say posting "Theocracy" as an improvement then a post later saying it isn't ... retarded.
I'm retarded? And you can't understand me! That's retarded.
What's your problem? I didn't say anything that should cause you to spew vitriol and call me retarded. You're allowing yourself to come unhinged over a simple statement you're apparently unwilling to comprehend.
It's not a question of "whose" theocracy. A theocracy isn't man made. Otherwise it ...[text shortened]... agree with my rationale, then argue against it. Calling me retarded only makes you look stupid.
Where have I said I don't understand you? (You are delusional now)
It is you who is saying you do not understand Sonhouse's post. (Calling it senseless)
And you should not use words you do not understand.
It seems "senseless" and "theocracy" are on that (long) list.
A theocracy is run by the Priests (or whatever the head men want to call themselves)
of a specific religion. That religion could be polytheist. Interested in that?
Originally posted by SuzianneAre you saying you don't thumb down the poster rather than the post?!
More "sneer" without evidence. Nevermind it's also untruthful.
FMF would be proud. Did he give you a gold star for that one?
If you can say that and keep a straight face, it's you who'll get the gold star.
25 May 17
Originally posted by wolfgang59A theocracy wouldn't be an improvement. It'd be the solution.
I'd say posting "Theocracy" as an improvement then a post later saying it isn't ... retarded.
Where have I said I don't understand you? (You are delusional now)
It is you who is saying you do not understand Sonhouse's post. (Calling it senseless)
And you should not use words you do not understand.
It seems "senseless" and "theocracy" are on that ...[text shortened]... all themselves)
of a specific religion. That religion could be polytheist. Interested in that?
