1. Joined
    12 Nov '06
    Moves
    74414
    24 Jul '16 19:03
    Originally posted by josephw
    The physical senses, knowledge of the truth and experience.

    And maybe just a little common sense and a bit of reasoning. I'm not going to spend all day proving an assertion with a statistical analysis of the state of man's condition.

    I think the only reason for asserting the idea that "we've been getting smarter" is due to the increase and availabilit ...[text shortened]... why you think we're "getting smarter"? Or that there is even such a thing as the "Flynn Effect"?
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flynn_effect
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cognitive_biases
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naive_realism_(psychology)
  2. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    53223
    24 Jul '16 22:13
    Originally posted by Great King Rat
    I suppose it matters how IQ is measured.

    How about making a healthy meal without relying on pre-packaged food, for instance?

    Or how about fixing something yourself when it's broken?

    I wonder if we've been getting dumber in those kinds of aspects.
    That is the Robert Heinlein effect.....
  3. Subscriberjosephw
    Owner
    Scoffer Mocker
    Joined
    27 Sep '06
    Moves
    9958
    25 Jul '16 02:34
    Originally posted by FMF
    So you've got no objective or empirical evidence to back your "The reality is society is getting dumber" thing?
    Yes. I'm getting smarter, so I know everyone else is getting dumber. 😉
  4. Joined
    28 Oct '05
    Moves
    34587
    25 Jul '16 02:38
    Originally posted by josephw
    Yes. I'm getting smarter, so I know everyone else is getting dumber. 😉
    A genuine attempt to explain what you claimed would have been more interesting.
  5. Subscriberjosephw
    Owner
    Scoffer Mocker
    Joined
    27 Sep '06
    Moves
    9958
    25 Jul '16 02:40
    Originally posted by KnightStalker47
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flynn_effect
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cognitive_biases
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naive_realism_(psychology)
    Look for Naive realism (psychology on one of Wikipedia's sister projects:
    Wiktionary (free dictionary)
    Wikibooks (free textbooks)
    Wikiquote (quotations)
    Wikisource (free library)
    Wikiversity (free learning resources)
    Commons (images and media)
    Wikivoyage (free travel guide)
    Wikinews (free news source)
    Wikidata (free linked database)
    Wikipedia does not have an article with this exact name. Please search for Naive realism (psychology in Wikipedia to check for alternative titles or spellings.
    Log in or create an account to start the Naive realism (psychology article, alternatively use the Article Wizard, or add a request for it.
    Search for "Naive realism (psychology" in existing articles.
    Look for pages within Wikipedia that link to this title.
    Other reasons this message may be displayed:

    If a page was recently created here, it may not be visible yet because of a delay in updating the database; wait a few minutes or try the purge function.
    Titles on Wikipedia are case sensitive except for the first character; please check alternative capitalizations and consider adding a redirect here to the correct title.
    If the page has been deleted, check the deletion log, and see Why was the page I created deleted?.

    That's what came up when I followed the third link. Somebody really smarter must have made a mistake! 😉
  6. Subscriberjosephw
    Owner
    Scoffer Mocker
    Joined
    27 Sep '06
    Moves
    9958
    25 Jul '16 02:45
    Originally posted by KnightStalker47
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flynn_effect
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cognitive_biases
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naive_realism_(psychology)
    The second link lead to more success. I found a list of "cognitive biases". Really brilliant. Psychologists must think everyone's insane. That's good to know since we're all getting so much smarter.
  7. Subscriberjosephw
    Owner
    Scoffer Mocker
    Joined
    27 Sep '06
    Moves
    9958
    25 Jul '16 02:49
    Originally posted by KnightStalker47
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flynn_effect
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cognitive_biases
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naive_realism_(psychology)
    The first link was even more interesting. In fact, I read it into a recorder to play back when I go to bed. No point in wasting time falling asleep.
  8. SubscriberVery Rusty
    Treat Everyone Equal
    Halifax, Nova Scotia
    Joined
    04 Oct '06
    Moves
    598328
    28 Jul '16 00:51
    Originally posted by FMF
    So you've got no objective or empirical evidence to back your "The reality is society is getting dumber" thing?
    Sir,
    Just read the forums! 😛

    Kind Regards,
    Sincerely,
    -VR
  9. Joined
    28 Oct '05
    Moves
    34587
    28 Jul '16 01:00
    FMF to josephw: So you've got no objective or empirical evidence to back your "The reality is society is getting dumber" thing?

    Originally posted by Very Rusty
    Just read the forums!
    No. The forums were the same 10 years ago as they are now. So it doesn't support josephw's claim.
  10. SubscriberVery Rusty
    Treat Everyone Equal
    Halifax, Nova Scotia
    Joined
    04 Oct '06
    Moves
    598328
    28 Jul '16 01:06
    Originally posted by FMF
    No. The forums were the same 10 years ago as they are now. So it doesn't support josephw's claim.
    Sir,
    Try to get out of your tunnel vision and look more closely! 😉 A lot of the smart people we had back then are gone!!! What replaced them not so great, lets put it that way!

    Kind Regards,
    Sincerely,
    -VR
  11. Standard memberlemon lime
    itiswhatitis
    oLd ScHoOl
    Joined
    31 May '13
    Moves
    5577
    28 Jul '16 01:14
    Originally posted by FMF
    So you've got no objective or empirical evidence to back your "The reality is society is getting dumber" thing?
    How about the guy in a self driving car that ran into a truck? He was watching a Harry Potter movie and not paying attention to the road.

    He was intelligent enough to procure and operate the latest in modern technology, but apparently lacked the common sense to understand that new technology doesn't necessarily mean safe technology. He died in the crash so he doesn't have the benefit of learning from his mistake, and for all we know he might have had a higher than average IQ.
  12. Joined
    28 Oct '05
    Moves
    34587
    28 Jul '16 01:18
    Originally posted by Very Rusty
    Try to get out of your tunnel vision and look more closely! 😉 A lot of the smart people we had back then are gone!!! What replaced them not so great, lets put it that way!
    I think the nostalgia about these forums overrates what was actually going on and is propagated by those still here who are some combination of mean spirited, lumbering, malcontented and artless, and probably always have been. I think the forums were much of a muchness 10 years ago.
  13. Joined
    28 Oct '05
    Moves
    34587
    28 Jul '16 01:19
    Originally posted by lemon lime
    How about the guy in a self driving car that ran into a truck? He was watching a Harry Potter movie and not paying attention to the road.

    He was intelligent enough to procure and operate the latest in modern technology, but apparently lacked the common sense to understand that new technology doesn't necessarily mean safe technology. He died in the cras ...[text shortened]... it of learning from his mistake, and for all we know he might have had a higher than average IQ.
    An anecdote is not empirical evidence.
  14. SubscriberVery Rusty
    Treat Everyone Equal
    Halifax, Nova Scotia
    Joined
    04 Oct '06
    Moves
    598328
    28 Jul '16 01:19
    Reminds me, then there is poke man or pokey man craze that is going on now. A couple of people walked off of a cliff, & a number other bad things have happened. I'll look it up when I have some free time. Don't know if you've all heard about it.

    Kind Regards,
    Sincerely,
    -VR
  15. Standard memberlemon lime
    itiswhatitis
    oLd ScHoOl
    Joined
    31 May '13
    Moves
    5577
    28 Jul '16 01:21
    Originally posted by FMF
    An anecdote is not empirical evidence.
    Is not empirical evidence of what?
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree