21 Jan 13
there's that,
and,
i think i've got a bead on the fundamental robots, but,
what about fundamental extra-terrestrials???
i mean, how do THEY fit into this whole dang mess???
thanks in advance for reasoned responses, those who would thumb this affair can promptly visit the seventh circle...
any silly poetry will be flagged for immediate deletion...
unless of course i write it, and then i'll expect allocates...
this oughta keep you dweebs busy for a day...
Originally posted by rookie54[Dislike]
there's that,
and,
i think i've got a bead on the fundamental robots, but,
what about fundamental extra-terrestrials???
i mean, how do THEY fit into this whole dang mess???
thanks in advance for reasoned responses, those who would thumb this affair can promptly visit the seventh circle...
any silly poetry will be flagged for immediate delet ...[text shortened]... write it, and then i'll expect allocates...
this oughta keep you dweebs busy for a day...
Comment: Mindless.
21 Jan 13
Originally posted by rookie54For ease of communication I cut your postinga dn insert my thoughts:
there's that,
and,
i think i've got a bead on the fundamental robots, but,
what about fundamental extra-terrestrials???
i mean, how do THEY fit into this whole dang mess???
thanks in advance for reasoned responses, those who would thumb this affair can promptly visit the seventh circle...
any silly poetry will be flagged for immediate deletio ...[text shortened]... write it, and then i'll expect allocates...
this oughta keep you dweebs busy for a day...
i think i've got a bead on the fundamental robots, but,
So you probably want to discuss the Robot laws by Asimov? A robot can't be too fundemantlistic in those trems in my opinion
what about fundamental extra-terrestrials???
Those reamion to be found. And if they are intelligent they can avoid that. If they are less intelligent we'll might get action like in some cheap SF
i mean, how do THEY fit into this whole dang mess???
thanks in advance for reasoned responses, those who would thumb this affair can promptly visit the seventh circle...
so you know Dante and show of? Shame on you for that.
any silly poetry will be flagged for immediate deletion...
as oppossed to intelligent or intelligeble poetry?
unless of course i write it, and then i'll expect allocates...
...
21 Jan 13
Originally posted by Ponderablefinally, a critique worth reading...
For ease of communication I cut your postinga dn insert my thoughts:
i think i've got a bead on the fundamental robots, but,
So you probably want to discuss the Robot laws by Asimov? A robot can't be too fundemantlistic in those trems in my opinion
what about fundamental extra-terrestrials???
Those reamion to be found. And if they a ...[text shortened]... e poetry?
unless of course i write it, and then i'll expect allocates...
...
the rest of you pay attention...
many thanks ponderable...
- Joined
- 29 Dec 08
- Moves
- 6788
21 Jan 13
Originally posted by rookie54Catholic teaching: Sin Requires an act that is evil, done intentionally, by a agent acting freely, who knows the act is evil.
there's that,
and,
i think i've got a bead on the fundamental robots, but,
what about fundamental extra-terrestrials???
i mean, how do THEY fit into this whole dang mess???
thanks in advance for reasoned responses, those who would thumb this affair can promptly visit the seventh circle...
any silly poetry will be flagged for immediate deletio ...[text shortened]... write it, and then i'll expect allocates...
this oughta keep you dweebs busy for a day...
How do we know those 4 criteria are met in a given situation? How do we know when one or more is not met?
Assuming we stipulate that the act is an evil one, the other 3 depend on what we know about the agent about which we are deciding.
That's my 2 cents.
21 Jan 13
Originally posted by JS357http://first-commandment.com/w/what-is-sin/
Catholic teaching: Sin Requires an act that is evil, done intentionally, by a agent acting freely, who knows the act is evil.
How do we know those 4 criteria are met in a given situation? How do we know when one or more is not met?
Assuming we stipulate that the act is an evil one, the other 3 depend on what we know about the agent about which we are deciding.
That's my 2 cents.
- Joined
- 29 Dec 08
- Moves
- 6788
21 Jan 13
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyThat link points out (among other things) that there can be sins of omission, that is, where the sin is failure to act when failure to act is evil, as well as sins of commission where the act is evil. The other o[point remain intact: intention, freedom, and knowledge that the act or failure to act is evil. It seems to me that these are things we'd need to know about the robot or alien or any entity, including ourselves, if we are to know if it is good or evil.
[b]http://first-commandment.com/w/what-is-sin/[/b]