I recently asked a democrat if he thought Iran would use a nuke first if they got one, but I said before the war. Because if Iran had a nuke and used it now that the aggressors are warring with Iran and are still bent on regime change I would not blame them.
If Iran did enrich uranium to close to 90% and nuked Israel I suspect Trump would say "see I told you so" and people would rally around him instead of saying Trump caused us to get nuked.
Would you understand that Iran had to defend itself from the aggressors, blame Trump for it and call for an end to the insane war or would you feel Trump was right all along and we have to nuke Iran into submission because they crossed a red line?
One more question. If Trump nuked pickax mountain would you say he crossed a red line and support impeachment or do you think it is great idea to get rid of their nuclear program?
@Metal-Brain saidI hope they make that mistake.
I recently asked a democrat if he thought Iran would use a nuke first if they got one, but I said before the war. Because if Iran had a nuke and used it now that the aggressors are warring with Iran and are still bent on regime change I would not blame them.
If Iran did enrich uranium to close to 90% and nuked Israel I suspect Trump would say "see I told you so" and p ...[text shortened]... d line and support impeachment or do you think it is great idea to get rid of their nuclear program?
It would be like someone saying in Sept 2023 .. "What if Palestinians attacked Israel and killed and raped thousands of Jews". People would focus on the damage to the Jews and be oblivious to the mass slaughter and total destruction that Gaza would face.
If Iran nuked any western country or the Jews, it would be the end of Iran, and good riddance too.
@Rajk999 saidThank you for unwittingly making the case that Iran would never nuke first for me. So why did the USA and Israel bomb Iran again?
I hope they make that mistake.
It would be like someone saying in Sept 2023 .. "What if Palestinians attacked Israel and killed and raped thousands of Jews". People would focus on the damage to the Jews and be oblivious to the mass slaughter and total destruction that Gaza would face.
If Iran nuked any western country or the Jews, it would be the end of Iran, and good riddance too.
So they cannot nuke second?
@Metal-Brain saidThey claim to be trying to make nukes.
Thank you for unwittingly making the case that Iran would never nuke first for me. So why did the USA and Israel bomb Iran again?
So they cannot nuke second?
Thats enough to bomb them.
@Metal-Brain saidDo you seriously think any even semi sane leader would nuke some American place, or military base when we have LITERALLY THOUSANDS of such weapons and it would take maybe THREE to completely destroy Iran so you really think they haven't figured that part out?
I recently asked a democrat if he thought Iran would use a nuke first if they got one, but I said before the war. Because if Iran had a nuke and used it now that the aggressors are warring with Iran and are still bent on regime change I would not blame them.
If Iran did enrich uranium to close to 90% and nuked Israel I suspect Trump would say "see I told you so" and p ...[text shortened]... d line and support impeachment or do you think it is great idea to get rid of their nuclear program?
You are creating a mountain out of a molehill. First off they DON'T have even 80% refined fissionables and Trump TOTALLY fked up TALKING about maybe I will bomb them maybe I won't and said that for three days and Iranians are not STUPID so they used that three days to load up over one hundred BIG trucks with centrifuges and what uranium or plutonium they had and whisked all that stuff away leaving a mainly empty cavern that bunker buster bomb blew up FOR NOTHING.
One of the worse military campaigns in US history BESIDES being a worthless exercise tearing up a carefully crafted nuclear monitor program where they could go to any nuke facilty anytime with or without notice and Trump tears it up not because it was a bad deal but because it was the result of OBAMA setting it all up and our allies AND a dozen nuclear scientests for science backup and what do we have now?
Two fking real estate dealers and what are they doing? 90% looking for business deals they can profit from, already up 2 billion from Saudi Arabia so OF COURSE 2 billion is not anywhere NEAR enough wealth because they compare themselved to our OTHER Traitor, Elon Muskrat.,
@Rajk999 saidStop lying. They do claim that at all.
They claim to be trying to make nukes.
Thats enough to bomb them.
Iran is a member of the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT)
Guess who is not. Israel.
@sonhouse saidWhy are you pretending you are disagreeing with me?
Do you seriously think any even semi sane leader would nuke some American place, or military base when we have LITERALLY THOUSANDS of such weapons and it would take maybe THREE to completely destroy Iran so you really think they haven't figured that part out?
You are creating a mountain out of a molehill. First off they DON'T have even 80% refined fissionables and Trump ...[text shortened]... not anywhere NEAR enough wealth because they compare themselved to our OTHER Traitor, Elon Muskrat.,
You are agreeing with me.
@Metal-Brain saidIran signed the Geneva Convention too. Only Muslims and fools trust Muslims. You must be both.
Stop lying. They do claim that at all.
Iran is a member of the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT)
Guess who is not. Israel.
Before you argue like an idiot, here are the facts.
***********************************
Q: Did Iran sign the Geneva Convention, and did they adhere to it? If not give some examples
A: Yes, the Islamic Republic of Iran ratified the four 1949 Geneva Conventions on February 20, 1957. However, it is not a party to Additional Protocol I of 1977 (though it is a signatory to Additional Protocols I, II, and III with internal ratification underway).
While Iran is legally bound by the core 1949 Geneva Conventions and customary international humanitarian law, compliance in practice has been a subject of long-standing dispute, with international bodies, human rights organizations, and opposing states accusing Iran of violations, while Iran similarly accuses its adversaries of breaching the conventions.
Examples of Contested Compliance and Violations
Treatment and Status of Prisoners of War (POWs): During the Iran–Iraq War (1980–1988), international observers and the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) documented numerous violations regarding the registration, detention conditions, and mistreatment of POWs by both sides, including restrictions on ICRC access and forced or coerced ideological indoctrination.
Protests and Internal Crackdowns: Human rights organizations (such as Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch) have repeatedly reported that Iran’s domestic security forces have used lethal force, arbitrary mass detentions, and torture against anti-government protesters—actions that challenge fundamental protections under international humanitarian and human rights standards.
Conduct of Hostilities and Proxy Conflicts: In regional conflicts involving Iranian-backed armed groups (such as in Lebanon, Yemen, or Syria), critics and UN reports have accused these groups of indiscriminate rocket and drone attacks targeting civilian infrastructure or failing to strictly uphold the principles of distinction and proportionality under the laws of war.
**********************************
- Joined
- 13 Nov 20
- Moves
- 5806
@Rajk999 said"Only Muslims and fools trust Muslims. You must be both"
Iran signed the Geneva Convention too. Only Muslims and fools trust Muslims. You must be both.
Before you argue like an idiot, here are the facts.
***********************************
Q: Did Iran sign the Geneva Convention, and did they adhere to it? If not give some examples
A: Yes, the Islamic Republic of Iran ratified the four 1949 Geneva Conventions on Febru ...[text shortened]... les of distinction and proportionality under the laws of war.
**********************************
Mr Rajk999 Makes huge sweeping generalization.
"Before you argue like an idiot"
Then accuses somebody else of arguing like an idiot.
"here are the facts"
Then after making huge sweeping generalizations suddenly becomes concerned about facts.
Hilarious.
@Sprogladog saidHere is what is hilarious. You Muslims will continue to support rogue Muslim states regardless of what those animals do. Here are some more atrocities from Iran, just in the last 20 years.
"Only Muslims and fools trust Muslims. You must be both"
Mr Rajk999 Makes huge sweeping generalization.
"Before you argue like an idiot"
Then accuses somebody else of arguing like an idiot.
"here are the facts"
Then after making huge sweeping generalizations suddenly becomes concerned about facts.
Hilarious.
*******************************
Below are the main documented violations over the last 20 years. They come mainly from UN bodies, the IAEA and major human rights groups. Iran rejects most of these findings as politically motivated, and that’s noted where it matters.
Human rights violations
Use of the death penalty
Mass executions. Iran executes more people than any country except possibly China. Amnesty recorded a worldwide total of 2,707 executions in 2025, the highest in decades, and Iran accounted for the majority. Many were for drug offences, which under the ICCPR don’t meet the “most serious crimes” threshold for the death penalty.
Executing people for crimes committed as children. Iran has repeatedly executed people for offences committed before age 18. This violates the Convention on the Rights of the Child and the ICCPR, both of which Iran has ratified.
Executing protesters after rapid trials, with reported torture and forced confessions, including after the 2022 protests.
Crackdowns on protests
2009 Green Movement: After the disputed election, protesters were killed, mass arrests followed, there were show trials, and abuse was reported at Kahrizak detention centre.
November 2019 fuel protests: Security forces killed hundreds of people; Amnesty documented over 300 deaths, and other estimates are higher. Iran also imposed a near-total internet shutdown.
2022 “Woman, Life, Freedom” protests, after Mahsa Amini died in morality police custody: A UN fact-finding mission found that Iran committed crimes against humanity, including murder, imprisonment, torture, rape and persecution. It also found Iran responsible for the physical violence that caused Amini’s death. Iran rejected the report as “false” and “biased”.
Treatment of women
Compulsory hijab laws, enforced through arrests, fines and violence by the morality police.
Legal discrimination in marriage, divorce, custody, inheritance and testimony.
Religious and ethnic minorities
Baha’is: Systematic persecution, including imprisoning leaders, barring them from universities, seizing property and destroying cemeteries.
Others: Christian converts are arrested for house-church activity. Sunni Muslims, Kurds, Baluchis and Arabs face discrimination, and executions fall disproportionately on Kurds and Baluchis.
Detention and expression
Torture and forced confessions, which are sometimes broadcast on state TV.
Hostage diplomacy: Iran detains dual nationals and foreigners on vague espionage charges and uses them as bargaining chips. Cases include Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe, Jason Rezaian, and the Swedish-Iranian doctor Ahmadreza Djalali, who is on death row.
Repression of expression: Journalists, lawyers and human rights defenders are jailed, including Nobel laureate Narges Mohammadi and lawyer Nasrin Sotoudeh. Iran also censors heavily and restricts the internet.
Killings and kidnappings abroad: Examples include the abduction and execution of journalist Ruhollah Zam (2020) and of the German-Iranian Jamshid Sharmahd (executed in 2024), and assassination plots against dissidents in Europe and the US.
Treaty and international-law violations
Nuclear obligations (NPT and its IAEA safeguards agreement)
2005: The IAEA Board found Iran in non-compliance with its safeguards agreement for years of undeclared nuclear activities.
2006–2010: The UN Security Council demanded that Iran suspend enrichment in a series of legally binding resolutions (1696, 1737, 1747, 1803, 1929). Iran didn’t comply, and sanctions followed.
2019 onward: After the US withdrew from the nuclear deal in 2018, Iran progressively went beyond its JCPOA limits, enriching uranium to 60%, close to weapons grade, and restricting inspections. The JCPOA was a political agreement rather than a treaty, and Iran argues the US broke it first.
June 2025: The IAEA Board formally found Iran in breach of its safeguards obligations, the first such finding in about 20 years.
2025: Britain, France and Germany triggered the “snapback” mechanism, which reimposed UN sanctions. Iran disputes that they had the legal authority to do so.
Other international law
Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations: In 2011 a mob stormed the British Embassy in Tehran while authorities failed to protect it. (The 1979 US embassy seizure was earlier than your 20-year window.)
UN Security Council arms resolutions:
Arms exports: Iran shipped weapons to Houthi forces in Yemen in violation of the arms embargo, as UN panels of experts documented.
Missiles: It tested missiles in defiance of Resolution 2231’s call to refrain.
Drones to Russia: It transferred drones to Russia, which used them against Ukraine. Western governments called this a violation of Resolution 2231; Iran and Russia deny it.
Ukraine International Airlines flight PS752 (January 2020): The IRGC shot down the plane, killing all 176 people on board, after Iran initially denied responsibility. Canada, Ukraine, Sweden and the UK have taken Iran to the International Court of Justice under the Montreal Convention on aviation safety.
Seizures of commercial ships in the Gulf, which are disputed under the law of the sea.
****************************
- Joined
- 13 Nov 20
- Moves
- 5806
@Rajk999 saidNo you're hilarious. Have a look at yourself you are willing to lie, exaggerate, make huge generalizations, use strawmen, misrepresent, be dishonest and use any tool you can to support your racist views. Doesn't that tell you something? If you had any confidence in your own views you wouldn't need to use these methods in a debate.
Here is what is hilarious. You Muslims will continue to support rogue Muslim states regardless of what those animals do. Here are some more atrocities from Iran, just in the last 20 years.
*******************************
Below are the main documented violations over the last 20 years. They come mainly from UN bodies, the IAEA and major human rights groups. Iran rejects ...[text shortened]... ercial ships in the Gulf, which are disputed under the law of the sea.
****************************
Cue pivot and rant about Iran/Muslims.
@Sprogladog saidLots of accusations with no proof or examples.
No you're hilarious. Have a look at yourself you are willing to lie, exaggerate, make huge generalizations, use strawmen, misrepresent, be dishonest and use any tool you can to support your racist views. Doesn't that tell you something? If you had any confidence in your own views you wouldn't need to use these methods in a debate.
Cue pivot and rant about Iran/Muslims.
You are useless.
@Rajk999 saidThis is how Israel has violated the Geneva Conventions for 75 years
Iran signed the Geneva Convention too. Only Muslims and fools trust Muslims. You must be both.
Before you argue like an idiot, here are the facts.
***********************************
Q: Did Iran sign the Geneva Convention, and did they adhere to it? If not give some examples
A: Yes, the Islamic Republic of Iran ratified the four 1949 Geneva Conventions on Febru ...[text shortened]... les of distinction and proportionality under the laws of war.
**********************************
The Zionist state has been making a mockery of the global rules mandating humanitarian behavior since long before October 7. The US has proved to be equally guilty.
https://www.trtworld.com/article/18194934
@Metal-Brain saidTRTWORLD - a bunch of biased Muslims trying to promote the cause of Islam. I dont read that garbage.
This is how Israel has violated the Geneva Conventions for 75 years
The Zionist state has been making a mockery of the global rules mandating humanitarian behavior since long before October 7. The US has proved to be equally guilty.
https://www.trtworld.com/article/18194934
From Claude AI:
************************
Q: What is the website www.trtworld.com about.
Is it a fair unbaised reporting site?
A: TRT World is the English-language international news channel of TRT, Turkey’s state broadcaster. It launched in 2015, is based in Istanbul, and is funded by the Turkish state. It covers world news with a particular focus on the Middle East, the Muslim world, Africa and the Global South, and it often frames stories as an alternative to Western media.
Is it fair and unbiased? Not on topics where the Turkish government has an interest. On those, it reflects the official Turkish position.
Where the bias is clearest:
Turkish domestic politics. TRT is widely seen as favouring President Erdoğan’s AKP. In one election period, a Turkish press-freedom outlet reported that TRT gave 32 hours of airtime to the AKP and only 25 minutes to the main opposition party. An Oxford Internet Institute study described TRT World as functioning like a “party broadcaster”.
Kurdish issues. It follows the government’s line on the PKK, Kurdish groups in Syria, and the pro-Kurdish opposition.
Turkey’s foreign policy. Coverage of Syria, Libya, Cyprus, Greece and Armenia follows Ankara’s positions.
Israel and Gaza. Coverage is strongly critical of Israel, consistent with the government’s stance.
Press freedom. It rarely covers Turkey’s own record of jailing journalists or its human rights problems.
In the US, TRT registered under the Foreign Agents Registration Act, which applies to outlets acting on behalf of a foreign government. Media Bias/Fact Check rates it as a government-influenced source with a pro-Turkish-government bias.
*****************************************