The GOP and the economy

The GOP and the economy

Debates

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Cryptic

Behind the scenes

Joined
27 Jun 16
Moves
3093
18 Aug 16
1 edit

What's with the GOP and the economy?? Every time I hear a speech from Donald Trump or listen to anyone on Fox news, all I hear about the economy is "terrible" "horrible" "a disaster" I'm not necessarily an Obama fan, since I think his foreign policy is (at best) inconsistent, but on 8/11 the NYSE, S&P 500 and NASDAQ hit all time highs on the same day, unemployment is about 5%, the national debt has been paid down each of the last 3 years. All in all, not a bad economic report, and far better than when Obama took office. So, why is the GOP so very sour on this economy? Do they think G.W. Bush's economy was better? Yes, we still face some economic issues, but I don't understand all the doom and gloom from the GOP.

w

Joined
02 Jan 06
Moves
12857
18 Aug 16

Originally posted by mchill
What's with the GOP and the economy?? Every time I hear a speech from Donald Trump or listen to anyone on Fox news, all I hear about the economy is "terrible" "horrible" "a disaster" I'm not necessarily an Obama fan, since I think his foreign policy is (at best) inconsistent, but on 8/11 the NYSE, S&P 500 and NASDAQ hit all time highs on the same day, unemplo ...[text shortened]... we still face some economic issues, but I don't understand all the doom and gloom from the GOP.
Economic growth has only been around 1% under Obama, this is the lowest in over 2 decades.

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/

You speak of paying the debt down yet every year the government runs deficits. We are almost to $20 trillion in debt. This rises exponentially yet no sense of urgency is seen in tackling it, nor has a government ever run up such debt so it is essentially uncharted territory.

Unemployment may read 5% but understand that this may include many part time jobs and exclude those who have given up on trying to find jobs. It also includes many full times jobs at minimum wage.

D

Joined
08 Jun 07
Moves
2120
19 Aug 16
1 edit

Civis Americanus Sum

New York

Joined
26 Dec 07
Moves
17585
19 Aug 16

Originally posted by mchill
What's with the GOP and the economy?? Every time I hear a speech from Donald Trump or listen to anyone on Fox news, all I hear about the economy is "terrible" "horrible" "a disaster" I'm not necessarily an Obama fan, since I think his foreign policy is (at best) inconsistent, but on 8/11 the NYSE, S&P 500 and NASDAQ hit all time highs on the same day, unemplo ...[text shortened]... we still face some economic issues, but I don't understand all the doom and gloom from the GOP.
Your fundamental point is accurate, but you need to be more careful with your terminology, understanding or both.

=== the national debt has been paid down each of the last 3 years ===

What you meant was that the annual budget deficit has been decreasing. In fact, the national debt has increased every year since 2001, since that was the last time the US registered a budget surplus.

While the current budget deficits aren't as bad as they were a few years ago, they're still terrible by historical standards.

Civis Americanus Sum

New York

Joined
26 Dec 07
Moves
17585
19 Aug 16
2 edits

Originally posted by whodey
Economic growth has only been around 1% under Obama, this is the lowest in over 2 decades.

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/

You speak of paying the debt down yet every year the government runs deficits. We are almost to $20 trillion in debt. This rises exponentially yet no sense of urgency is seen in tackling it, nor has a government ever run up s ...[text shortened]... ho have given up on trying to find jobs. It also includes many full times jobs at minimum wage.
Bizarre that whodey gets 5 thumbs down for his most accurate post in weeks.

A couple of minor corrections:

Economic growth under Obama has averaged more like 1.5%, not 1% and that number is largely hampered by the recession of 2009, which really was not Obama's fault. So the stat, while true, is misleading.

Also, while the national debt is increasing, it's difficult to argue that it's increasing "exponentially." It's increasing at a slower rate than it was in 2009 and 2010.

rain

Joined
08 Mar 11
Moves
12351
19 Aug 16
1 edit

Originally posted by sh76
Bizarre that whodey gets 5 thumbs down for his most accurate post in weeks.
Originally posted by sh76
So the stat [by whodey], while true, is misleading.

That's why.

Z

Joined
04 Feb 05
Moves
29132
19 Aug 16

Originally posted by sh76
Your fundamental point is accurate, but you need to be more careful with your terminology, understanding or both.

=== the national debt has been paid down each of the last 3 years ===

What you meant was that the annual budget deficit has been decreasing. In fact, the national debt has [b]increased
every year since 2001, since that was the last time th ...[text shortened]... cits aren't as bad as they were a few years ago, they're still terrible by historical standards.[/b]
so even though the deficit has been steadily falling since the bush years when it reached a peak, it's still terrible and somehow obama's fault?

w

Joined
02 Jan 06
Moves
12857
19 Aug 16

Originally posted by vivify
Originally posted by sh76
[b]So the stat [by whodey], while true, is misleading.

That's why.[/b]
Yes, that 0.5% makes such a difference. 🙄

Cape Town

Joined
14 Apr 05
Moves
52945
19 Aug 16

Originally posted by whodey
Yes, that 0.5% makes such a difference. 🙄
It makes a 50% difference.

Civis Americanus Sum

New York

Joined
26 Dec 07
Moves
17585
19 Aug 16

Originally posted by Zahlanzi
so even though the deficit has been steadily falling since the bush years when it reached a peak, it's still terrible and somehow obama's fault?
First, I didn't say it was Obama's fault.

Second, the highest deficit was 2009, by which year Obama was President.

Third, the fact that the deficit has been becoming less terrible each year is not anything to brag about. 2009 is a terrible point of reference. It was during a massive recession and included a truckload of stimulus spending. 2009 should have been a terrible aberration, not a new standard upon which to try to improve upon.

That the deficit has not come down faster and is still very high by historical standards is something that it is fair to hold Obama accountable for (at least in part).

w

Joined
02 Jan 06
Moves
12857
19 Aug 16

Originally posted by twhitehead
It makes a 50% difference.
1.5% is still terrible dingleberry