19 Aug 18
This is a post from another site, not mine, but I thought it interesting enough to bring here.
"Should Trump order expanding the scope of the Mueller Investigation??
In a late night brain storm session, a few attorneys I am friends with suggested that Trump should instruct Rosenstine to open up the democrat side of Russian collusion including Hillary and democrats. With all the "out in the open" evidence of corruption and collusion why doesn't he simply have Rosenstine open the Special Counsels scope to include FISA fraud and perjury along with Hillary, Obama and the whole DNC criminal organization?
I had to laugh about this because none of them knew Rosenstine had signed one of the false FISA affidavits.... This would place Rosenstine in jeopardy for perjury.
So what do you think... Open it up (which would be such a conflict for Rosenstine he would have to recuse himself) or let it remain as is? State why..."
19 Aug 18
Originally posted by @kazetnagorraSean Hannity mentioned it to his psychiatrist.
What's the "out in the open" evidence you are referring to?
19 Aug 18
Originally posted by @kazetnagorraNot sure, I did not write it.
What's the "out in the open" evidence you are referring to?
Do you know any out in the open evidence of Russian collusion?
- Joined
- 05 Nov 06
- Moves
- 142486
19 Aug 18
Originally posted by @whodeythat is already within the scope of the investigation. mueller turns a blind eye to it...the investigation is an illegal farce created on false info. mueller is not there to investigate Trump so much as he is there to protect the dnc.
This is a post from another site, not mine, but I thought it interesting enough to bring here.
"Should Trump order expanding the scope of the Mueller Investigation??
In a late night brain storm session, a few attorneys I am friends with suggested that Trump should instruct Rosenstine to open up the democrat side of Russian collusion including Hillary ...[text shortened]... a conflict for Rosenstine he would have to recuse himself) or let it remain as is? State why..."
19 Aug 18
Originally posted by @mott-the-hoopleAn illegal farce???
that is already within the scope of the investigation. mueller turns a blind eye to it...the investigation is an illegal farce created on false info. mueller is not there to investigate Trump so much as he is there to protect the dnc.
Really?
You retard.
19 Aug 18
Originally posted by @whodeyThe Justice Department, not a president, should be making decisions on who or whom should be investigated. Trump is just pissed off that the Justice Department is not loyal to him but rather to the country and the Constitution. Trump wants to control the press and the Justice Department and all departments dealing with national security. He respects and envies dictators. He wants to be a dictator and is doing all he can to make this happen, including his dictator style military parade. Thankfully, it has been cancelled.
This is a post from another site, not mine, but I thought it interesting enough to bring here.
"Should Trump order expanding the scope of the Mueller Investigation??
In a late night brain storm session, a few attorneys I am friends with suggested that Trump should instruct Rosenstine to open up the democrat side of Russian collusion including Hillary ...[text shortened]... a conflict for Rosenstine he would have to recuse himself) or let it remain as is? State why..."
Originally posted by @whodeySure I do, but so do you.
Not sure, I did not write it.
Do you know any out in the open evidence of Russian collusion?
In any case, the special counsel is charged with investigating Russian meddling in the elections, so to the extent that Democrats were involved with this, they are already under the scope of the investigation. It just so happens that we know of many Trump campaign and administration officials that were involved in aiding the Kremlin, and we don't know of any DNC or Democratic politicians doing the same.
20 Aug 18
Originally posted by @whodeyFollow the money as they say. The Russians have been pumping up T's finances for decades, since 1984 and it seems to have been a brilliant strategy, they now have the POTUS as a Russian asset.
This is a post from another site, not mine, but I thought it interesting enough to bring here.
"Should Trump order expanding the scope of the Mueller Investigation??
In a late night brain storm session, a few attorneys I am friends with suggested that Trump should instruct Rosenstine to open up the democrat side of Russian collusion including Hillary ...[text shortened]... a conflict for Rosenstine he would have to recuse himself) or let it remain as is? State why..."
- Joined
- 05 Nov 06
- Moves
- 142486
21 Aug 18
Originally posted by @sonhouseI think Trump may be about ready to sell them some uranium...better keep an eye on him.
Follow the money as they say. The Russians have been pumping up T's finances for decades, since 1984 and it seems to have been a brilliant strategy, they now have the POTUS as a Russian asset.
21 Aug 18
Originally posted by @mott-the-hoopleThe same Meuller that GWB appointed. The same Meuller that Obama said hey stay on if you want and received 100% Senate approval.
that is already within the scope of the investigation. mueller turns a blind eye to it...the investigation is an illegal farce created on false info. mueller is not there to investigate Trump so much as he is there to protect the dnc.
That biased shill Meuller????