18 Apr '19 14:56>
@mott-the-hoople saidThis made the news and is well known.
LOL...you are straight up lying! Im sure that would have made the news, why dont you post a link?
I will post a link only after you admit you're an ignorant redneck.
@mott-the-hoople saidThis made the news and is well known.
LOL...you are straight up lying! Im sure that would have made the news, why dont you post a link?
@mott-the-hoople saidYeah, Barr is SO believable. This is Barr Phase 2. In 1989 he did the same thing, used the same words even in his assessment of the 'law opinion' about being able to kidnap foreign leaders anywhere in the world and bring them to court in the US. He white washed that to congress and it was proven 2 years later he lied big time, saying it was all about domestic law when the actual opinion was scathing in its review citing international law and repercussions if we did that. So here we have Barr doing exactly the same thing again. No collusion. What a shocker. Who could have POSSIBLY guessed he would say that? And at that dog and pony show he conducted this morning, NO MUELLER. What a shocker. And not ten minutes later, almost as if Trump KNEW what was going to be said he does a twitter thing using game of thrones image, which may be a violation of copyright law saying game over. Also what a shocker.
did you not hear the part where mueller said there WAS NO COLLUSION?
my goodness, what is wrong with your thinking?
@vivify saidI am an ignorant redneck...bring it on
This made the news and is well known.
I will post a link only after you admit you're an ignorant redneck.
@sonhouse saidLOL...barr stated why Trump received it first...it is common practice for the accused to see the accuser...oh and a constitutional right too. Did you watch any of this?
Yeah, Barr is SO believable. This is Barr Phase 2. In 1989 he did the same thing, used the same words even in his assessment of the 'law opinion' about being able to kidnap foreign leaders anywhere in the world and bring them to court in the US. He white washed that to congress and it was proven 2 years later he lied big time, saying it was all about domestic law when the ac ...[text shortened]... to make as to the veracity of the charges, it is and always has been CONGRESS to make that decision.
@mott-the-hoople said"Accused"? But I thought the report completely exonerates Trump and didn't accuse him of anything?
LOL...barr stated why Trump received it first...it is common practice for the accused to see the accuser...oh and a constitutional right too. Did you watch any of this?
@kazetnagorra saidyou are just too stupid to dialog with.
"Accused"? But I thought the report completely exonerates Trump and didn't accuse him of anything?
@mott-the-hoople saidGood boy.
I am an ignorant redneck...bring it on
Some on Mueller's Team Say Report Was More Damaging Than Barr Revealed
Some of Robert S. Mueller III’s investigators have told associates that Attorney General William P. Barr failed to adequately portray the findings of their inquiry and that they were more troubling for President Trump than Mr. Barr indicated
@livineasy4 saidYou have no clue what's in this report skippy. You're just displaying your own ignorance.
MSNBC has pushed collusion for 2,5 years, but there was none. They said there was no spying...There was spying. Everything seems to me to be reversed. I bet this will now be clarified, and hopefully we can all move on.
@vivify saidThen your post does it for me. I’m switching, voting for guy with the self-made-up Mexican name, ...Beto is it? Has some really new ideas, never talks about himself, and gave .03% of his $400k income to charity. A solid guy. Commander in Chief material!
Even then, Mueller's team condemned Barr's interpretation of the report as wrong.
@averagejoe1 saidOops.....003%. $1200.00.
Then your post does it for me. I’m switching, voting for guy with the self-made-up Mexican name, ...Beto is it? Has some really new ideas, never talks about himself, and gave .03% of his $400k income to charity. A solid guy. Commander in Chief material!
@averagejoe1 saidYou really are a certified assswipe. You know full well there are a couple dozen Dems running. I doubt Beto will win the nomination anyway. You don't do sarcasm very well. Don't quit your day job.
Then your post does it for me. I’m switching, voting for guy with the self-made-up Mexican name, ...Beto is it? Has some really new ideas, never talks about himself, and gave .03% of his $400k income to charity. A solid guy. Commander in Chief material!
@sonhouse saidIs not facetious-ness allowed? Just funnin here. Obviously I would not vote for an unqualified candidate, one people would gladly replace Trump with. I was being facetious. I like analogies too, like the guy who works and the guy who doesn’t. .....what to do with the salary at the end of the day. I guess it sounds mean spirited, when the only time I AM serious, and maybe not in keeping with this greatly clever humor, is when some are truly relentlessly pursuing our president to hell and back. I’m a Patriot. Sorry for any offense. Joe
You really are a certified assswipe. You know full well there are a couple dozen Dems running. I doubt Beto will win the nomination anyway. You don't do sarcasm very well. Don't quit your day job.