1. Subscribershavixmir
    Guppy poo
    Sewers of Holland
    Joined
    31 Jan '04
    Moves
    87851
    04 Mar '17 17:25
    Originally posted by Eladar
    I provided the dictionary entry that says they are.
    everything that is plausible is possible.
    Not everything that is possible is plausible.

    It's like saying banana and fruit are synonyms.
    Perhaps you need a better dictionary.
  2. Standard memberno1marauder
    Naturally Right
    Somewhere Else
    Joined
    22 Jun '04
    Moves
    42677
    04 Mar '17 18:041 edit
    Originally posted by Eladar
    I provided the dictionary entry that says they are.
    No, it didn't. It said plausible was:

    seeming reasonable or probable.

    Please don't tell me you think possible and probable are synonyms.
  3. Joined
    12 Jul '08
    Moves
    13814
    04 Mar '17 20:38
    Originally posted by no1marauder
    No, it didn't. It said plausible was:

    seeming reasonable or [b]probable
    .

    Please don't tell me you think possible and probable are synonyms.[/b]
    synonyms: credible, reasonable, believable, likely, feasible, tenable, possible, conceivable, imaginable;
  4. Subscribershavixmir
    Guppy poo
    Sewers of Holland
    Joined
    31 Jan '04
    Moves
    87851
    04 Mar '17 20:47
    Originally posted by Eladar
    synonyms: credible, reasonable, believable, likely, feasible, tenable, possible, conceivable, imaginable;
    It's been explained.
    Get over it.
  5. Standard memberHandyAndy
    Read a book!
    Joined
    23 Sep '06
    Moves
    18677
    04 Mar '17 21:04
    Originally posted by Eladar
    synonyms: credible, reasonable, believable, likely, feasible, tenable, possible, conceivable, imaginable;
    Is English your second language?
  6. Joined
    12 Jul '08
    Moves
    13814
    04 Mar '17 23:05
    Originally posted by HandyAndy
    Is English your second language?
    I guess a dictionary isn't good enough for some.

    In any case, I believe there is at least a 50 50 chance that Obama had it done.
  7. R
    Standard memberRemoved
    Joined
    08 Dec '04
    Moves
    100919
    05 Mar '17 00:02
    Originally posted by Eladar
    I guess a dictionary isn't good enough for some.

    In any case, I believe there is at least a 50 50 chance that Obama had it done.
    It fits his mo...
  8. Standard memberHandyAndy
    Read a book!
    Joined
    23 Sep '06
    Moves
    18677
    05 Mar '17 00:26
    Originally posted by Eladar
    I guess a dictionary isn't good enough for some.

    In any case, I believe there is at least a 50 50 chance that Obama had it done.
    How do you arrive at 50% probability. Justify your numbers.
  9. Standard memberHandyAndy
    Read a book!
    Joined
    23 Sep '06
    Moves
    18677
    05 Mar '17 00:27
    Originally posted by checkbaiter
    It fits his mo...
    Can you provide an example?
  10. Joined
    12 Jul '08
    Moves
    13814
    05 Mar '17 00:55
    Originally posted by HandyAndy
    How do you arrive at 50% probability. Justify your numbers.
    One side is as truthful as the other, with slight edge to Trump.

    Obama has been a known liar for most of his Presidency.
  11. Joined
    12 Jul '08
    Moves
    13814
    05 Mar '17 00:57
    Originally posted by HandyAndy
    Can you provide an example?
    You really need to get over your man crush for Obama.
  12. Standard memberHandyAndy
    Read a book!
    Joined
    23 Sep '06
    Moves
    18677
    05 Mar '17 02:41
    Originally posted by Eladar
    One side is as truthful as the other, with slight edge to Trump.

    Obama has been a known liar for most of his Presidency.
    The only thing you're proving is your ignorance.
  13. Standard memberHandyAndy
    Read a book!
    Joined
    23 Sep '06
    Moves
    18677
    05 Mar '17 02:45
    Originally posted by Eladar
    You really need to get over your man crush for Obama.
    Is that the best you have to offer? Crawl back under your rock.
  14. Standard memberHandyAndy
    Read a book!
    Joined
    23 Sep '06
    Moves
    18677
    05 Mar '17 03:26
    The president’s decision on Saturday to lend the power of his office to accusations against his predecessor of politically motivated wiretapping — without offering any proof — was remarkable, even for a leader who has repeatedly shown himself willing to make assertions that are false or based on dubious sources.

    It would have been difficult for federal agents, working within the law, to obtain a wiretap order to target Mr. Trump’s phone conversations. It would have meant that the Justice Department had gathered sufficient evidence to convince a federal judge that there was probable cause to believe Mr. Trump had committed a serious crime or was an agent of a foreign power, depending on whether it was a criminal investigation or a foreign intelligence one.

    Former officials pointed to longstanding laws and procedures intended to ensure that presidents cannot wiretap a rival for political purposes.

    “A cardinal rule of the Obama administration was that no White House official ever interfered with any independent investigation led by the Department of Justice,” said Kevin Lewis, a spokesman for Mr. Obama. “As part of that practice, neither President Obama nor any White House official ever ordered surveillance on any U.S. citizen.”

    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/04/us/politics/trump-obama-tap-phones.html
  15. Joined
    12 Jul '08
    Moves
    13814
    05 Mar '17 05:00
    Originally posted by HandyAndy
    Is that the best you have to offer? Crawl back under your rock.
    I decided not to go a bit more crude but funny. So no, not all I got, but as far as I will go.
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree