Mandatory voting in the U.S.

Mandatory voting in the U.S.

Debates

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.

K

Germany

Joined
27 Oct 08
Moves
3118
24 Mar 15

Originally posted by Eladar
Evidence is in the eye of the beholder. You want to see what you want to see.
And what you want to see is evidently not the evidence.

E

Joined
12 Jul 08
Moves
13814
24 Mar 15

Originally posted by KazetNagorra
And what you want to see is evidently not the evidence.
Yes, I do not want to see what you would believe is 'evidence'. So in your eyes, I do not want to see 'the evidence'.

K

Germany

Joined
27 Oct 08
Moves
3118
25 Mar 15

Originally posted by Eladar
Yes, I do not want to see what you would believe is 'evidence'. So in your eyes, I do not want to see 'the evidence'.
I see. So according to which evidence do recently introduced voter ID laws in the US not primarily repress legal voters?

n

The Catbird's Seat

Joined
21 Oct 06
Moves
2598
26 Mar 15

Originally posted by no1marauder
There's absolutely no evidence that Voter ID laws do anything but repress and intimidate actual legal voters which is what they are intended to do.
Reiterating the good Democratic mantra.

K

Germany

Joined
27 Oct 08
Moves
3118
26 Mar 15

Originally posted by normbenign
Reiterating the good Democratic mantra.
So what are they intended to do? Voter fraud is irrelevant, so that can't be it.