@wildgrasssaid I thought you wanted to know about deaths? Benefit is a totally different set of data points
They do list deaths.
"the number of fatal side effects is at 4.11/100,000 vaccinations. For three deaths prevented by vaccination we have to accept two inflicted by vaccination. Conclusions: This lack of clear benefit should cause governments to rethink their vaccination policy."
The numbers are different than your article, right?
Your study excluded certain people, didn't it?
Did the study you posted use VAERS data?
Did they rely on data from Pfizer?
"the number of fatal side effects is at 4.11/100,000 vaccinations. For three deaths prevented by vaccination we have to accept two inflicted by vaccination. Conclusions: This lack of clear benefit should cause governments to rethink their vaccination policy."
The numbers are different than your article, right?
Your study excluded certain people, didn't it?
Did the study you posted use VAERS data?
Did they rely on data from Pfizer?
No. It was a real clinical trial. The exact gold standard study used to answer your exact question and you completely ignored it for a anti cdc talking point.
@wildgrasssaid No. It was a real clinical trial. The exact gold standard study used to answer your exact question and you completely ignored it for a anti cdc talking point.
Your study excluded certain people. Can you list them?
The study you posted used VAERS data.
They used data from Pfizer.
The study I posted is from Israel data as well, yet the numbers are different.
@sonhousesaid @Metal-Brain It doesn't matter to you HOW much we show you, YOU ARE RIGHT ALWAYS and WE ARE ALWAYS WRONG.
You have never shown me anything. All you do is troll to avoid debates.
You never debate. That requires proving stuff and you never prove anything. You just lie.
@wildgrasssaid NOOOOO! I'm not trying to prove you wrong. I'm trying to provide you with the data you need to answer your question. VAERS AINT IT. THE CDC AINT IT.
You don't want to absorb the information!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!