1. Joined
    20 Oct '06
    Moves
    9551
    17 Sep '21 01:05
    @metal-brain said
    I can't remember every link you post. I don't remember much about it. Here is another study I found that contradicts your conclusion.

    https://archive.is/3FbAx

    Conclusions: This lack of clear benefit should cause governments to rethink their vaccination policy.
    I thought you wanted to know about deaths? Benefit is a totally different set of data points
  2. Joined
    07 Dec '05
    Moves
    22048
    17 Sep '21 01:091 edit
    @wildgrass said
    I thought you wanted to know about deaths? Benefit is a totally different set of data points
    They do list deaths.

    "the number of fatal side effects is at 4.11/100,000 vaccinations. For three deaths prevented by vaccination we have to accept two inflicted by vaccination. Conclusions: This lack of clear benefit should cause governments to rethink their vaccination policy."


    The numbers are different than your article, right?
    Your study excluded certain people, didn't it?

    Did the study you posted use VAERS data?
    Did they rely on data from Pfizer?
  3. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    53223
    17 Sep '21 01:15
    @Metal-Brain
    You AND that article are so full of shyte you should be in an 19th century outhouse.

    And OF COURSE you will post some OTHER BS post you think helps your side.

    It doesn't but A. You don't care, and B, it makes you look like an IDIOT.

    But you LOVE negative attention.
  4. Joined
    07 Dec '05
    Moves
    22048
    17 Sep '21 01:20
    @sonhouse said
    @Metal-Brain
    You AND that article are so full of shyte you should be in an 19th century outhouse.

    And OF COURSE you will post some OTHER BS post you think helps your side.

    It doesn't but A. You don't care, and B, it makes you look like an IDIOT.

    But you LOVE negative attention.
    Then you should be able to prove it.
    I am waiting.
  5. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    53223
    17 Sep '21 01:23
    @Metal-Brain
    We already have dozens of times over. You are too thick to see it.
  6. Joined
    20 Oct '06
    Moves
    9551
    17 Sep '21 01:29
    @metal-brain said
    They do list deaths.

    "the number of fatal side effects is at 4.11/100,000 vaccinations. For three deaths prevented by vaccination we have to accept two inflicted by vaccination. Conclusions: This lack of clear benefit should cause governments to rethink their vaccination policy."


    The numbers are different than your article, right?
    Your study excluded certain people, didn't it?

    Did the study you posted use VAERS data?
    Did they rely on data from Pfizer?
    No. It was a real clinical trial. The exact gold standard study used to answer your exact question and you completely ignored it for a anti cdc talking point.
  7. Joined
    07 Dec '05
    Moves
    22048
    17 Sep '21 01:31
    @sonhouse said
    @Metal-Brain
    We already have dozens of times over. You are too thick to see it.
    That is a lie.
    You never prove me wrong.

    Prove you proved me wrong then.
    If it is true you should easily be able to do that.
    I am waiting.
  8. Joined
    07 Dec '05
    Moves
    22048
    17 Sep '21 01:34
    @wildgrass said
    No. It was a real clinical trial. The exact gold standard study used to answer your exact question and you completely ignored it for a anti cdc talking point.
    Your study excluded certain people. Can you list them?

    The study you posted used VAERS data.
    They used data from Pfizer.

    The study I posted is from Israel data as well, yet the numbers are different.
  9. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    53223
    17 Sep '21 01:34
    @Metal-Brain
    It doesn't matter to you HOW much we show you, YOU ARE RIGHT ALWAYS and WE ARE ALWAYS WRONG.
  10. Joined
    07 Dec '05
    Moves
    22048
    17 Sep '21 01:45
    @sonhouse said
    @Metal-Brain
    It doesn't matter to you HOW much we show you, YOU ARE RIGHT ALWAYS and WE ARE ALWAYS WRONG.
    You have never shown me anything. All you do is troll to avoid debates.
    You never debate. That requires proving stuff and you never prove anything. You just lie.
  11. Joined
    20 Oct '06
    Moves
    9551
    17 Sep '21 03:33
    @metal-brain said
    That is a lie.
    You never prove me wrong.

    Prove you proved me wrong then.
    If it is true you should easily be able to do that.
    I am waiting.
    NOOOOO! I'm not trying to prove you wrong. I'm trying to provide you with the data you need to answer your question. VAERS AINT IT. THE CDC AINT IT.

    You don't want to absorb the information!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    It's sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo frustrating.
  12. Joined
    07 Dec '05
    Moves
    22048
    17 Sep '21 21:54
    @wildgrass said
    NOOOOO! I'm not trying to prove you wrong. I'm trying to provide you with the data you need to answer your question. VAERS AINT IT. THE CDC AINT IT.

    You don't want to absorb the information!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    It's sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo frustrating.
    The study you posted used VAERS data.
    DUH!
  13. Joined
    20 Oct '06
    Moves
    9551
    17 Sep '21 23:08
    @metal-brain said
    The study you posted used VAERS data.
    DUH!
    Noooo
  14. Joined
    07 Dec '05
    Moves
    22048
    18 Sep '21 01:06
    @wildgrass said
    Noooo
    Yes, it says so right in the study.
    Try reading your own source.
  15. Joined
    20 Oct '06
    Moves
    9551
    18 Sep '21 22:17
    @metal-brain said
    Yes, it says so right in the study.
    Try reading your own source.
    Please elaborate.
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree