http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/02/090205142132.htm

It looks as if Washington DC is on borrowed time as global warming threatens to submerge it under water forever.

So should global warming be viewed as a threat or something that will eventually save us?

So if science tells us that Washington DC will be under water someday, then does that mean they should move?

Put another way, those that continue to build up the area and sell real estate at prices that are among the highest in the world, are they science deniers?

I know that I will do my part. I plan on eating a can of baked beans daily. 😵

Should this be considered an act of terrorism? 😲

Originally posted by whodey
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/02/090205142132.htm

It looks as if Washington DC is on borrowed time as global warming threatens to submerge it under water forever.

So should global warming be viewed as a threat or something that will eventually save us?

Originally posted by Metal Brain
From what I understand Antarctica ice is not melting at the ice sheet off shore from land.

http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/2013/05/why-climate-change-means-more----and-less----ice-for-the-antarctic.html

Originally posted by whodey
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/02/090205142132.htm

It looks as if Washington DC is on borrowed time as global warming threatens to submerge it under water forever.

So should global warming be viewed as a threat or something that will eventually save us?

Originally posted by bill718
Interesting article. Global warming is a genuine threat, and flooding millions of square miles of costal land will NOT save us... Who dreamed that idea up?? Sadly, despite the warnings of leading scientists, there are millions who can't connect the thousands of tons of pollution our cars and smokestacks spew into our air every year with the greenhouse effect ...[text shortened]... ue to melt, the ocean levels will continue to rise. and we have only ourselves to blame for it.