Originally posted by moon1969
The statements your refer are in regard to enforcement, and never say or indicate that the President does not have a right (or obligation) to make a constitutional determination.

I never addressed the issue of enforcement, but only that all three branches of government make constitutional assessments of laws.

Nevertheless, you are wrong to suggest t ...[text shortened]... tice of the Supreme Court has something to say about what is and what will be settled precedent.

He has one vote.

Settled law is still; laws are presumed Constitutional and the President is obliged to obey the law. If he wishes to challenge that, he goes to the courts - he is not permitted to make unilateral determinations and act upon them.