Democrats...

Originally posted by @mott-the-hoople
So Mueller pulled him from case illegally? BTW...I think its cute when a liberal speaks of violating laws...lol

Nope. Mueller can set his staff up as he pleases; he regarded the allegations as a distraction, so Strozk was moved out of the investigation but he remains in the FBI. Firing him as you support would have been a violation of Federal law and his Constitutional rights; not that right wingers care about either of those things.

This whole Congressional farce is a backdoor attempt to obstruct Mueller's investigation. It's not going to work.

Originally posted by @no1marauder
Nope. Mueller can set his staff up as he pleases; he regarded the allegations as a distraction, so Strozk was moved out of the investigation but he remains in the FBI. Firing him as you support would have been a violation of Federal law and his Constitutional rights; not that right wingers care about either of those things.

This whole Congressional farce is a backdoor attempt to obstruct Mueller's investigation. It's not going to work.

You do realize Trump can fire them all don't you?

Originally posted by @mott-the-hoople
You do realize Trump can fire them all don't you?

Actually he can't fire Mueller.

And he can't fire Strozk for his political views either without violating the statute I mentioned.

Originally posted by @no1marauder
Actually he can't fire Mueller.

And he can't fire Strozk for his political views either without violating the statute I mentioned.

Argue with a Harvard law school professor...
"If he wanted to, wrote Jack Goldsmith, a Harvard Law School professor and co-founder of Lawfare, Trump could then fire Rosenstein. In that case, the authority over Mueller would fall to the associate attorney general. In theory — and ignoring the political consequences of doing so — Trump could keep firing people until he got someone to follow through on an order to fire Mueller.
“That means it could go down the line until an assistant attorney general did not resign and instead carried out the President’s order,” Goldsmith wrote."

https://www.factcheck.org/2017/06/can-trump-fire-mueller/

Originally posted by @mott-the-hoople
Argue with a Harvard law school professor...
"If he wanted to, wrote Jack Goldsmith, a Harvard Law School professor and co-founder of Lawfare, Trump could then fire Rosenstein. In that case, the authority over Mueller would fall to the associate attorney general. In theory — and ignoring the political consequences of doing so — Trump could keep fir ...[text shortened]... esident’s order,” Goldsmith wrote."

https://www.factcheck.org/2017/06/can-trump-fire-mueller/

Sure, he could do that (though your links shows he can't fire Mueller); it worked out great for Nixon. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saturday_Night_Massacre

It also possibly kept Robert Bork off the SCOTUS.

Originally posted by @mott-the-hoople
Obama changed the democrat party to fascist with the weaponizing of govt agencies to maintain democrat control. The latest discovery, the FBI and dept of Justice.

Well, that worked perfectly, then, seeing that there are Democrat party murder squads openly roaming the streets of Detroit and Santa Fe...

Seriously, you teabaggers need to learn not to use words you don't really understand.

Originally posted by @mott-the-hoople
You do realize Trump can fire them all don't you?

So... why doesn't he? If the case is as clear-cut as you claim it is, why hasn't your hero put his enemies in jail yet?

Originally posted by @shallow-blue
So... why doesn't he? If the case is as clear-cut as you claim it is, why hasn't your hero put his enemies in jail yet?

Because Trump knows there is no "there there"... quoting someone from the other side.

Originally posted by @no1marauder
Sure, he could do that (though your links shows he can't fire Mueller); it worked out great for Nixon. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saturday_Night_Massacre

It also possibly kept Robert Bork off the SCOTUS.

Trump can most certainly effect his removal. You cling to a false view that he cant have him removed, be it directly or indirectly.

Originally posted by @mott-the-hoople
Because Trump knows there is no "there there"... quoting someone from the other side.

It's going to be fun reading your posts when the Kushner indictment comes out.

Originally posted by @mott-the-hoople
Trump can most certainly effect his removal. You cling to a false view that he cant have him removed, be it directly or indirectly.

On the contrary, I hope he does just what Nixon did.

Originally posted by @no1marauder
On the contrary, I hope he does just what Nixon did.

Trump is playing Meuller like a fiddle.
The entire Meuller investigation is a ruse, created by illegal actions by a corrupt FBI.

Originally posted by @mott-the-hoople
Trump is playing Meuller like a fiddle.
The entire Meuller investigation is a ruse, created by illegal actions by a corrupt FBI.

Somebody should tell Michael Flynn that; he's singing like a bird to Mueller to avoid a stretch in Federal prison. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/flynn-kept-fbi-interview-concealed-white-house-trump-n840491

And Bannon's going to be questioned soon by Mueller's team about lots and lots of "interesting" things. https://www.cnn.com/2018/01/24/politics/robert-mueller-steve-bannon-questioning/index.html

Originally posted by @no1marauder
And Bannon's going to be questioned soon by Mueller's team about lots and lots of "interesting" things. https://www.cnn.com/2018/01/24/politics/robert-mueller-steve-bannon-questioning/index.html

have you not noticed every time the intel comm investigation comes out with something (text messages) the Meuller investigation comes out with breaking news? They are playing you for a fool and you are eating it up.