Dem funny Californians

Dem funny Californians

Debates

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Civis Americanus Sum

New York

Joined
26 Dec 07
Moves
17585
02 Feb 10

Originally posted by KazetNagorra
It's not a bad idea, this Calfornia bill. But of course it should come with a tax increase to pay for it, which is reasonable since people won't be paying for any health insurance anymore under a single payer system.
And, in theory, giving everyone a new house, two new cars and a 2 week Caribbean vacation each year is a good idea too.

But, the problem is that you need to be able to pay for it.Calfiornia would never be able to assess the kind of tax hike necessary to overcome its own financial woes and provide single payer healthcare. The numbers simply don't come close to adding up.

A US state simply can't just wake up one morning and raise the state income tax to 30%. It would instantly lose almost all of its businesses to neighboring states.

M

Joined
08 Oct 08
Moves
5542
02 Feb 10

Originally posted by sh76
And, in theory, giving everyone a new house, two new cars and a 2 week Caribbean vacation each year is a good idea too.

But, the problem is that you need to be able to pay for it.Calfiornia would never be able to assess the kind of tax hike necessary to overcome its own financial woes and provide single payer healthcare. The numbers simply don't come close t ...[text shortened]... income tax to 30%. It would instantly lose almost all of its businesses to neighboring states.
If California (or some other state) could come up with a healthcare plan that eliminated the need for employers to pay for their workers' healthcare, that might be rather attractive to many businesses.

Civis Americanus Sum

New York

Joined
26 Dec 07
Moves
17585
02 Feb 10

Originally posted by Melanerpes
If California (or some other state) could come up with a healthcare plan that eliminated the need for employers to pay for their workers' healthcare, that might be rather attractive to many businesses.
Not if it had to raise its income tax rates sky high to pay for it.

M

Joined
08 Oct 08
Moves
5542
02 Feb 10
1 edit

Originally posted by sh76
Not if it had to raise its income tax rates sky high to pay for it.
healthcare costs are becoming an absurd game of hot potato.

premiums keep skyrocketing every year. At some point, the employers are going to say "no mas" and throw the potato to the individual employees - who will then toss it to the Democrats - who will then toss it to the rich people - who will then toss it to the GOP - who will then toss it to Sarah Palin - who will then toss it to the Tea Party Movement - who will then toss it to whodey - who will then toss it to zeeblebot - who will then c&p something written by some blogger in Romania that actually solves the problem.

Civis Americanus Sum

New York

Joined
26 Dec 07
Moves
17585
02 Feb 10

Originally posted by Melanerpes
healthcare costs are becoming an absurd game of hot potato.

premiums keep skyrocketing every year. At some point, the employers are going to say "no mas" and throw the potato to the individual employees - who will then toss it to the Democrats - who will then toss it to the rich people - who will then toss it to the GOP - who will then toss it to Sarah ...[text shortened]... o will then c&p something written by some blogger in Romania that actually solves the problem.
So who gets credit for saving the World, Zeeblebot or the Romanian blogger?

M

Joined
08 Oct 08
Moves
5542
02 Feb 10

Originally posted by sh76
So who gets credit for saving the World, Zeeblebot or the Romanian blogger?
Joe Lieberman will find a way to take all the credit.

K

Germany

Joined
27 Oct 08
Moves
3118
02 Feb 10

Originally posted by sh76
Not if it had to raise its income tax rates sky high to pay for it.
How does income tax affect businesses, intrinsically?

silicon valley

Joined
27 Oct 04
Moves
101289
02 Feb 10

Originally posted by sh76
So who gets credit for saving the World, Zeeblebot or the Romanian blogger?
zeeblebot, evidently. who knows from romanian bloggers?

Civis Americanus Sum

New York

Joined
26 Dec 07
Moves
17585
02 Feb 10

Originally posted by KazetNagorra
How does income tax affect businesses, intrinsically?
1) Business pay income tax

2) Employees will need and demand higher salaries if they have to pay more of their salaries in income tax

I'm not sure I understand your question.

K

Germany

Joined
27 Oct 08
Moves
3118
02 Feb 10
1 edit

Originally posted by sh76
1) Business pay income tax

2) Employees will need and demand higher salaries if they have to pay more of their salaries in income tax

I'm not sure I understand your question.
1) Maybe if you look at it administratively. But of course it boils down to people paying tax from their gross income. The employer doesn't pay for their employees' cars, pets, food, etc. either. The employer just pays the gross income, which is unaffected (directly) by income tax.

2) Not necessarily. For sure they won't "need" it if the tax increase will get them cost reductions that outweigh the loss of income. And the employer does not have to give in to the employees' demands, especially if everyone else is faced with the same tax increase.

HG

Joined
22 Jun 08
Moves
8801
02 Feb 10

Originally posted by Badwater
Job loss and reduced benefits are already a fact of life.

As for increased prices, that doesn't hurt in Oregon as much as one might think - we have no sales taxes.
There ya go, no sales tax. I wonder when that will raise it's ugly head?
However, I think our property taxes are way high.

remember THE SPOTTED OWL...............have yet to see one?

M

Joined
08 Oct 08
Moves
5542
02 Feb 10
1 edit

The de facto "requirement" that employers pay for their workers' health insurance could be thought of as a tax. A tax that employers in other countries don't have to pay. And it's a "tax" that automatically rises every year because premiums keep going up at a rapid rate.

I'm sure most of these employers would rejoice if this "tax" was removed and replaced by a personal income tax (or some other source for paying premiums that doesn't involve payroll).

mt
Walleye Guy

Gone fishin'

Joined
22 Mar 05
Moves
15170
03 Feb 10

Originally posted by Badwater
Job loss and reduced benefits are already a fact of life.

As for increased prices, that doesn't hurt in Oregon as much as one might think - we have no sales taxes.
So do you think increasing taxes on corps that have already cut jobs, reduced bennys, and raised prices will have a positive effect on the economy?

Indications on all fronts are that the Big Pain is yet to come.

mt
Walleye Guy

Gone fishin'

Joined
22 Mar 05
Moves
15170
03 Feb 10

Originally posted by Melanerpes
The de facto "requirement" that employers pay for their workers' health insurance could be thought of as a tax. A tax that employers in other countries don't have to pay. And it's a "tax" that automatically rises every year because premiums keep going up at a rapid rate.

I'm sure most of these employers would rejoice if this "tax" was removed and repla ...[text shortened]... l income tax (or some other source for paying premiums that doesn't involve payroll).
As an employer I would certainly be overjoyed.

mt
Walleye Guy

Gone fishin'

Joined
22 Mar 05
Moves
15170
03 Feb 10

Originally posted by Hugh Glass
There ya go, no sales tax. I wonder when that will raise it's ugly head?
However, I think our property taxes are way high.

remember THE SPOTTED OWL...............have yet to see one?
No sales or income tax here in NH and things have been ok for decades.
Now the Dems are in power and suddenly there's a 'revenue shortfall' which can only be overcome by an income AND sales tax. It's coming boys, so ya better get ready.

btw Our property taxes are through the roof as well. The bright side is it's the only way gov has to get into our wallets at the moment.