Climategate

The scandal should have ended climate catastrophism. Instead, it was studiously buried by politicians, scientists, activists and crony capitalists, who will rake in trillions of dollars from the exaggerations and fakery, while exempting themselves from the damage they will inflict on everyday families.

https://intellectualtakeout.org/2019/11/climategate-ten-years-later/

I have said it before and I will say it again. Tax private planes first. If you don't you are not really alarmed, are you? The dinosaur era had 5 times today's CO2 and life thrived on earth until the asteroid impact.

https://www.livescience.com/44330-jurassic-dinosaur-carbon-dioxide.html

@metal-brain said
The scandal should have ended climate catastrophism. Instead, it was studiously buried by politicians, scientists, activists and crony capitalists, who will rake in trillions of dollars from the exaggerations and fakery, while exempting themselves from the damage they will inflict on everyday families.

https://intellectualtakeout.org/2019/11/climategate-ten-years-later ...[text shortened]... til the asteroid impact.

https://www.livescience.com/44330-jurassic-dinosaur-carbon-dioxide.html

HahahahahahahahahahahahahshshshshHzhHBhahahHhshshshshshshhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

@shavixmir
The dinosaur era had 5 times today's CO2 and life thrived on earth until the asteroid impact.

https://www.livescience.com/44330-jurassic-dinosaur-carbon-dioxide.html

Despite the high CO2 of the Paleozoic atmosphere, when CO2 levels were greater than 4000 ppmv (parts per million by volume), scientific evidence indicates a period of glaciation around 445 million years ago variously called the ''Early Palaeozoic Icehouse (EPI)'' and the ''Hirnantian Glaciation''.

https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029/1999PA900021

There is no evidence CO2 causes global warming.

Oh for fukk’s sake.

Check out: the end-Triassic mass extinction, the end-Permian mass extinction and the Paleocene-Eocene thermal maximum.

High levels of CO2 have always ended in disaster. And the spikes of CO2 reached always take thousands of years to reach the highest levels.
The current spike is spiking rapidly in the space of 150 years. And is spiking ever higher.

CO2 warms the Earth (actually, it prevents the warmth from the Sun escaping rhe armosphere which leads to increasing temperatures) which leads to rising sea levels.
That is just basic knowledge.

Your argument is that the Earth was flourishing with dinosaurs until they were all wiped out by an asteroid (although it was probably the combination of an asteroid collission, vulcanic eruptions… and bloody global warming).

So, as the seas rise, storms get worse, flooding becomes wide spread, droughts, probably a shift in temperature zones… you explain that it will all be alright after the next asteroid impact?

The only gate about bloody climate is that the gate to reason is firmly locked on a small, yet very loud, group of retards.

Oh. Before you spin out of control on one of your mad-hatter rants, understand that I don’t give a flying fukk about climate change. Doesn’t interest me in the least.
But to deny it’s happening is utter stupidity.

@shavixmir said
Oh for fukk’s sake.

Check out: the end-Triassic mass extinction, the end-Permian mass extinction and the Paleocene-Eocene thermal maximum.

High levels of CO2 have always ended in disaster. And the spikes of CO2 reached always take thousands of years to reach the highest levels.
The current spike is spiking rapidly in the space of 150 years. And is spiking ever highe ...[text shortened]... ut climate change. Doesn’t interest me in the least.
But to deny it’s happening is utter stupidity.

LOL!

Are you seriously blaming CO2 on glaciation during the late Ordovician-Silurian and an asteroid strike during the Jurassic?

"The current spike is spiking rapidly in the space of 150 years. And is spiking ever higher."

If there was any evidence CO2 caused GW that might mean something, but.....

https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029/1999PA900021

...I just proved it doesn't.

"But to deny it’s happening is utter stupidity."

I have NEVER denied climate change. Lying like you are is utter stupidity because you are embarrassing yourself. Every link I have posted on here proves climate change. You are making it too easy for me. I don't even need to embarrass you because you are embarrassing yourself.

You have been brainwashed by so much propaganda you think climate change means something it doesn't.

@metal-brain said
LOL!

Are you seriously blaming CO2 on glaciation during the late Ordovician-Silurian and an asteroid strike during the Jurassic?

"The current spike is spiking rapidly in the space of 150 years. And is spiking ever higher."

If there was any evidence CO2 caused GW that might mean something, but.....

https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029/1999PA9 ...[text shortened]... You have been brainwashed by so much propaganda you think climate change means something it doesn't.

Dude. Nobody reads your links.
I've told you this a hundred times.

@shavixmir
LOL!
Did you do a poll to find out?
Some people read my links to avoid embarrassing themselves. You have not learned that yet.

Late Ordovician glaciation under high atmospheric CO2:

https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029/1999PA900021

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2022-11-10/international-hypocrisy-and-ignorance-conference-begins

@metal-brain said
@shavixmir
LOL!
Did you do a poll to find out?
Some people read my links to avoid embarrassing themselves. You have not learned that yet.

Late Ordovician glaciation under high atmospheric CO2:

https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029/1999PA900021

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2022-11-10/international-hypocrisy-and-ignorance-conference-begins

Zerohedge… the corner stone of every sane and scientifically proven thesis.

@Metal-Brain

One day you’ll be the only person left alive on earth and you’ll be able to tell everyone “I told you so”.

@shavixmir said
HahahahahahahahahahahahahshshshshHzhHBhahahHhshshshshshshhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

The greenies have been telling us about some kind of tipping point for years, the tipping points come and are then passed, and of course if we're past the tipping point all their wet dream regulations are voided. So we don't hear about all the failed tipping points.

The other thing we don't hear about is where was all that carbon in fossil fuels before it got buried. It used to be part of the carbon cycle, and part of the carbon cycle is CO2, so for thousands of years we've been losing carbon from the carbon cycle, some of it goes round and round but every year some gets dropped out of the cycle. It could be argued that mans use of ff is returning carbon back into its natural cycle. Of course CO2 was at one time a higher percentage of the atmosphere.

Tell us about the new tipping point shag doody for brains.

@shavixmir said
Zerohedge… the corner stone of every sane and scientifically proven thesis.

Late Ordovician glaciation under high atmospheric CO2:

https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029/1999PA900021

I just proved CO2 does not cause global warming. The Pliocene being a lot warmer despite having about the same CO2 levels as today should have been enough to convince everyone, but the late Ordovician glaciation is undeniable proof.

It is time for you and all the other alarmists to resolve the contradiction of the late Ordovician glaciation and AGW theory and accept CO2 does not cause warming in the atmosphere.

@metal-brain said
Late Ordovician glaciation under high atmospheric CO2:

https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029/1999PA900021

I just proved CO2 does not cause global warming. The Pliocene being a lot warmer despite having about the same CO2 levels as today should have been enough to convince everyone, but the late Ordovician glaciation is undeniable proof.

It is ...[text shortened]... e late Ordovician glaciation and AGW theory and accept CO2 does not cause warming in the atmosphere.

You are wasted here; your knowledge and skills would be best employed in advising the global scientific community.

@divegeester said
You are wasted here; your knowledge and skills would be best employed in advising the global scientific community.

That is another myth. The global scientific community does not believe what you do. You just think they do because you heard rumors that they do. Try to prove it and you will find out.

The first thing you need to remember is that there is a difference between a scientist and a climate scientist. Not all scientists are climate scientists. There are plenty of scientists that don't know squat about climate. It would be like asking a dentist you don't know how to repair a car. Wrong field of study.

@metal-brain said
That is another myth. The global scientific community does not believe what you do. You just think they do because you heard rumors that they do. Try to prove it and you will find out.

The first thing you need to remember is that there is a difference between a scientist and a climate scientist. Not all scientists are climate scientists. There are plenty of scientists ...[text shortened]... climate. It would be like asking a dentist you don't know how to repair a car. Wrong field of study.

Yes there are different fields of science.

Your point is what?

@divegeester
As if I didn't explain that perfectly.
The late Freeman Dyson was a scientist. Does his opinion on climate science matter to you? Yes or no?