02 Jun 17
Originally posted by FreakyKBHJust what part of ZERO do you not comprehend? I said it at least 3 times now and all you do is repeat the REALLY stupid question. None, Nada, zip, no sats for ordinary cell phones except maybe overseas calls but even that could be just fiber to Europe. SO FUKING WHAT?
I'll spell it out for ya.
Public cell phone coverage: do satellites account for any of it?
02 Jun 17
Originally posted by sonhouseShhhh...
Just what part of ZERO do you not comprehend? I said it at least 3 times now and all you do is repeat the REALLY stupid question. None, Nada, zip, no sats for ordinary cell phones except maybe overseas calls but even that could be just fiber to Europe. SO FUKING WHAT?
02 Jun 17
Originally posted by FreakyKBHWhat is it about several of our answers that causes you to think we have not answered your pointless question? Here we go again, you ask a question we answer it you go answer it please. Are you in some kind of time warp you can't understand the answers we give or are you just getting your jollies off?
I asked a very pointed question in the OP.
Answer just that question if you are able.
02 Jun 17
Originally posted by sonhouseI'm a little sheepish, honestly.
What is it about several of our answers that causes you to think we have not answered your pointless question? Here we go again, you ask a question we answer it you go answer it please. Are you in some kind of time warp you can't understand the answers we give or are you just getting your jollies off?
I see at the top of this page you finally (somewhat) responded with "zero."
It's just that you--- like several other posters here--- literally NEVER provide a straight answer when asked a direct question.
Even when the question is as simple as yes/no, you evade, obfuscate and generally avoid answering without taking off in any number of directions.
Even at the top of this page after umpteen times being asked, you inexplicably fine it necessary to throw in additional caveats.
Such tactics are the time killer, not anything I'm doing in the conversation.
If you're acknowledging that cell phones work independently of satellites, then the question is answered.
Thank you for your pathetically drawn out response, sonhouse.
02 Jun 17
1 edit
Originally posted by FreakyKBHIf you can actually read, I said ZERO in the middle page 2 of this pathetic thread. And then again later. It is YOU who have a problem with reading comprehension. And what do you mean 'somewhat'? Cell phones don't use satellites normally, although I imagine the military can switch calls whenever they want through whatever sat they want, that is no big secret but ordinary cell phones, towers only.
I'm a little sheepish, honestly.
I see at the top of this page you finally (somewhat) responded with "zero."
It's just that you--- like several other posters here--- literally NEVER provide a straight answer when asked a direct question.
Even when the question is as simple as yes/no, you evade, obfuscate and generally avoid answering without taking of ...[text shortened]... s, then the question is answered.
Thank you for your pathetically drawn out response, sonhouse.
Are you doubting THAT now? I know sats are against your religion but why are you even bothering with this cell phone crap known to kindergarten kids?
02 Jun 17
Originally posted by sonhouseI rest my case: you can't answer simple questions without piling on needless crap.
If you can actually read, I said ZERO in the middle page 2 of this pathetic thread. And then again later. It is YOU who have a problem with reading comprehension. And what do you mean 'somewhat'? Cell phones don't use satellites normally, although I imagine the military can switch calls whenever they want through whatever sat they want, that is no big secre ...[text shortened]... ur religion but why are you even bothering with this cell phone crap known to kindergarten kids?
Thanks, buddy!