A Second Bill of Rights

A Second Bill of Rights

Debates

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.

d

Joined
17 Jun 09
Moves
1538
06 Aug 09

Originally posted by PsychoPawn
So you agree that In god we trust is a violation of the first amendment? Good... now we're getting somewhere 😉
You mean "in God we trust", no it's not good.

P

Joined
06 May 05
Moves
9174
06 Aug 09

Originally posted by daniel58
You mean "in God we trust", no it's not good.
That's what I said.. in god we trust.

I agree that it's not good that it's on our currency.

d

Joined
17 Jun 09
Moves
1538
06 Aug 09

Originally posted by PsychoPawn
That's what I said.. in god we trust.

I agree that it's not good that it's on our currency.
GOD!

No I don't agree.

P

Joined
06 May 05
Moves
9174
06 Aug 09

Originally posted by daniel58
GOD!

No I don't agree.
Yes, that is how you spell god. Good.

d

Joined
17 Jun 09
Moves
1538
06 Aug 09

Originally posted by PsychoPawn
Yes, that is how you spell god. Good.
That is how EVERYBODY should spell God.

P

Joined
06 May 05
Moves
9174
06 Aug 09

Originally posted by daniel58
That is how EVERYBODY should spell God.
You're quite the little fascist aren't you?

I'll spell god how I like thank you.

god god god god god god god god god god god god god god god god god god god god god god god god god god god god god god god god god god god god god god god god god god god god god god god god god god god

d

Joined
17 Jun 09
Moves
1538
07 Aug 09

Originally posted by PsychoPawn
You're quite the little fascist aren't you?

I'll spell god how I like thank you.

god god god god god god god god god god god god god god god god god god god god god god god god god god god god god god god god god god god god god god god god god god god god god god god god god god god
That doesn't make it right.

P

Joined
06 May 05
Moves
9174
07 Aug 09

Originally posted by daniel58
That doesn't make it right.
It's sacrilicious.

d

Joined
17 Jun 09
Moves
1538
07 Aug 09

Originally posted by PsychoPawn
It's sacrilicious.
Not a word.

P

Joined
06 May 05
Moves
9174
07 Aug 09

Originally posted by daniel58
Not a word.
I know... it's my combination of sacriligious and delicious. 🙂

d

Joined
17 Jun 09
Moves
1538
07 Aug 09

Originally posted by PsychoPawn
I know... it's my combination of sacriligious and delicious. 🙂
thatisn'tright

P

Joined
06 May 05
Moves
9174
07 Aug 09

Originally posted by daniel58
thatisn'tright
No, it's sacrilicious 😀

w

Joined
02 Jan 06
Moves
12857
07 Aug 09

Originally posted by PsychoPawn
So you agree that In god we trust is a violation of the first amendment? Good... now we're getting somewhere 😉
Nope, I never said I did agree. Sorry mate.

w

Joined
02 Jan 06
Moves
12857
07 Aug 09

Originally posted by AThousandYoung
Those are Entitlement Rights. We can recognize them if we want but they are not inalienable. Calling them "Rights" is probably a poor idea.
Well try telling that to a statist like Obama who thinks that health care is an inalienable right.

g

Pepperland

Joined
30 May 07
Moves
12892
07 Aug 09

Originally posted by whodey
Well try telling that to a statist like Obama who thinks that health care is an inalienable right.
yes, the government is bad and we should get rid of everything from the government, why have police if we can have vigilantes?

you're right, nobody should have healthcare, if somebody gets sick and need treatment we just have to say "bad luck, loser!"
let the poor die in the streets, who needs them anyway?