09 Sep '21 16:26>
Maybe crowning a new champion will liven things up a bit. 😀
@very-rusty saidIt sounds like a good idea,but in practice,as someone has already said,it could be a greater incentive for sandbagging.
The more I think about it, the more sense it makes!
Probably will not happen, but a good suggestion in my humble opinion.
-VR
@venda said@Venda,
It sounds like a good idea,but in practice,as someone has already said,it could be a greater incentive for sandbagging.
The league format is not popular but do you remember Rusty the "league type" system I tried a few years ago?
That seemed to work quite well, although running it manually was very laborious.I got a bunch of volunteers ,matched them up by rating as close as I ...[text shortened]... ms for the competition.I know Russ reads the forums,so maybe he could be interested in such a system
@venda saidAgreed, I believe things will just continue as they are and people will complain but have no solutions or possible solutions to the problems which we all know exist.
Thanks for your reply and suggestions Rusty.
Much has been said about the clans and the clan system in general.
It still seems all anyone cares about is the net points list but I don't intend to re visit that issue.
The chess world seems to be mainly focused on the blitz type games when you read anything in the press.Even the top level championships include blitz games now. ...[text shortened]... ys of correspondence chess,which essentially what this site is, are coming to the end of their life.
@wycombe-al saidPlaying on here is essentially correspondence chess(apart from the live option recently introduced)It's just a different medium and with time limits.
@venda correspondence chess, i never experienced the good old days of moves in the post, my dad used to play chess by post in the 70s and 80s, guess games went on a long time
@wycombe-al saidIt wasn't a great system because letters also got lost in the mail. Here your opponent is waiting for a move you sent, only for the letter to get lost in the mail. It must have been very frustrating.
@venda correspondence chess, i never experienced the good old days of moves in the post, my dad used to play chess by post in the 70s and 80s, guess games went on a long time
@very-rusty saidI played correspondence chess in the 60's
It wasn't a great system because letters also got lost in the mail. Here your opponent is waiting for a move you sent, only for the letter to get lost in the mail. It must have been very frustrating.
-VR
@lemondrop saidNice it worked for you.
I played correspondence chess in the 60's
looking forward for the mail every day was fun
I think I completed around a dozen games
played by phone also but was a bit more expensive
@wycombe-al saidHaving not played myself I am not sure, but have heard that players would make up their times per move allowing for late letters. In many cases it was no time limit, those games could go on for years!
did correspondence chess have timeout rules?
@lemondrop saidJesus Lemon. And I thought Rusty was old. 60's? I had you pegged for around 13 to 15 years old. Wonders never cease!
I played correspondence chess in the 60's
looking forward for the mail every day was fun
I think I completed around a dozen games
played by phone also but was a bit more expensive