13 Nov 07
Originally posted by PalynkaTake a look at see for yourself or just be a Rignorant moron. I don't care.
More parochialism from the usual suspect.
http://web.mlsnet.com/media/player/mp_tpl.jsp?w=mms%3A//a1503.v115042.c11504.g.vm.akamaistream.net/7/1503/11504/v0001/mlbmls.download.akamai.com/11504/2007/open/topplays/11/110807_chfner_twellman_goal_350.wmv&w_id=14941&catCode=top_plays&type=v_free&_mp=%20%201
13 Nov 07
1 edit
Originally posted by Red NightIt was a good goal but far from goal of the year. Tim Cahill's is better especially when you consider it was against Chelsea not some 3rd rate American team.
Tim Twellman's bicycle kick goal against DC in the Eastern Finals has to be the goal of the year.
13 Nov 07
Originally posted by Virtue76Yes Nani's goal against Middlesborough was a cracker ,but i still think Cahills was better,Nani had excellent lead up tro that goal ,and in a previous post i rated that as the best goal this season ,up until Cahills.
Nani has scored a couple this season.
Oh well these things always offer good debate.
We might even see a better one yet.
13 Nov 07
Originally posted by boarmanIts all about opinions my friend... and bias 😉 I agree though, Cahills was a very good goal.
Yes Nani's goal against Middlesborough was a cracker ,but i still think Cahills was better,Nani had excellent lead up tro that goal ,and in a previous post i rated that as the best goal this season ,up until Cahills.
Oh well these things always offer good debate.
We might even see a better one yet.
13 Nov 07
Originally posted by EsotericThe type of goal he scored doesn't get better when you consider the opposition. He didn't beat 4 Chelsea defenders with skill, movement and guile - he athletically connected with an overhead kick, the opposition is irrelevant.
It was a good goal but far from goal of the year. Tim Cahill's is better especially when you consider it was against Chelsea not some 3rd rate American team.
As much as I like an overhead kick or a long range strike, all-round team goals are more my thing.