17 Aug 08
3 edits
Originally posted by sonhouseGood swimmer, but he has chance to compete in 8 events, most athletes don't.
8 for 8 beats 1,2,3!
Gonna be a few decades before anyone even matches that one!
Cyclists on the track can do plural events but not 8, athletes can do two or three and perhaps a relay, but not 8. And take something like judo, one event, that's all.
How many other sports offer so many categories to their participants? Seems like a farce to me, 100m this, 150m that, 200m this and 250m that, relays, different strokes (no Arnold in sight)...
If others did this, Phelps would not be alone, and I for one think we should undermine his total superiority by reminding each other that he has had this unique privilege, however talented he may be with it. Congratulations all the same!
17 Aug 08
I agree with asromacalcio. 8 in the pool is equivalent to about 3 on the track. Yep, Phelps is very good but he's not as good as the tally suggests.
I may be wrong but I think in swimming people have 6 or more golds 4 times, no other sport has ever come close. It's not coincidence.
Swimming is also one of those sports where it's simply not accessable to everyone. I live in the UK, a modern well developed rich western country yet there is a huge shortage of 50m pools. Think what it must be like in less well deveoped countries. Look at who wins all the medals in the pool, they are split between a few countries due to the sports inaccessability to the world as a whole.
As I said Phelps is very good but he is not the best ever Olympian as people tout him. I'm afraid his sport is to unrepresentative of the world for him to be that great. It's been said many times by people more in the know than me, 3 golds in the pool is worth one on the track. I agree.
I would however offer the caveat that any Olympic gold is a fantastic achievement and the winners deserve our respect.
17 Aug 08
Originally posted by asromacalcioYes, but the fact he can be top in the world in each stroke when most specialize in one or another is amazing.
Good swimmer, but he has chance to compete in 8 events, most athletes don't.
Cyclists on the track can do plural events but not 8, athletes can do two or three and perhaps a relay, but not 8. And take something like judo, one event, that's all.
How many other sports offer so many categories to their participants? Seems like a farce to me, 100m thi ...[text shortened]... s had this unique privilege, however talented he may be with it. Congratulations all the same!
18 Aug 08
Originally posted by golfer1The main point is nobody came close to Mark Spitz since 1972, that is a long time, 8 oympiad's gone by without even Spitz's #. Even if you say 3 swimming gold's are worth 1 track and field, that gives Phelps nearly 5 gold medals, having won 14 now. Don't forget, he is only 23 so he will be 27 for the London meet and will still be around to collect more. I was wondering why there were no black folk in this competition though, the expense angle would explain that. I bet places like Jamaica could field world class swimmers if they could afford the 50 m pools like you said. That said, any place with a calm ocean or large lake could lay out 50 m strips, it's not impossible to train that way.
Yes, but the fact he can be top in the world in each stroke when most specialize in one or another is amazing.
18 Aug 08
Originally posted by asromacalcioYou can compete for what you can qualify for. He was good enough in 8 different event to qualify and win them all. If anyone is going to doubt the achievment level of this, then they have mental issues and need help.
Good swimmer, but he has chance to compete in 8 events, most athletes don't.
Cyclists on the track can do plural events but not 8, athletes can do two or three and perhaps a relay, but not 8. And take something like judo, one event, that's all.
How many other sports offer so many categories to their participants? Seems like a farce to me, 100m thi ...[text shortened]... s had this unique privilege, however talented he may be with it. Congratulations all the same!
18 Aug 08
Originally posted by PocketKingsi agree. hes doing different strokes, which is a disadvantage when other guys are specializing in event and hes varying his distance/stroke. 8 golds is amazing, how many other whole countries will get that many?
You can compete for what you can qualify for. He was good enough in 8 different event to qualify and win them all. If anyone is going to doubt the achievment level of this, then they have mental issues and need help.
18 Aug 08
Originally posted by PocketKingsNow now... it's not that he didn't achieve great things, but that other sportsmen didn't have such scope and will leave Beijing with a single gold, yet they're just as talented, train just as hard, and beat their opponents just as easily.
You can compete for what you can qualify for. He was good enough in 8 different event to qualify and win them all. If anyone is going to doubt the achievment level of this, then they have mental issues and need help.
18 Aug 08
Originally posted by asromacalcioDon't forget Phelps qualified for breastroke, freestyle, backstroke and so forth, they were individual races and was competing fairly in those.
Now now... it's not that he didn't achieve great things, but that other sportsmen didn't have such scope and will leave Beijing with a single gold, yet they're just as talented, train just as hard, and beat their opponents just as easily.
18 Aug 08
Originally posted by sonhouseHe did, he's great, the best, but if he only had one event to compete in yet the same talent he'd leave a virtual unknown.
Don't forget Phelps qualified for breastroke, freestyle, backstroke and so forth, they were individual races and was competing fairly in those.
I'm trying to redress the balance a bit, he does have the advantage of choice.
- Joined
- 28 Jun 01
- Moves
- 36847
18 Aug 08
Originally posted by irontigranI agree, and not only did he win 8 golds, he set 7 new WR's and 1 new OR in these events as well. Track & field is the only other sport that someone could come close for the opportunity to win so many medals and that would be a rarity with athletes training towards specific disciplines. While I wouldn't classify him as the greatest athlete ever, he's definitely the best in his field.
i agree. hes doing different strokes, which is a disadvantage when other guys are specializing in event and hes varying his distance/stroke. 8 golds is amazing, how many other whole countries will get that many?
18 Aug 08
Originally posted by irontigranEven NZ is beating USA in the birds nest.. lol (enjoying the moment while it lasts)
they recently killed/terrorized a lot of people with a homeland invasion.... and only the United States can do that! 😠😉
Hardly sport thread stuff taking a swipe at Russia.. Listening to Ms Rice barking orders to Russia over their intrusion into Georgia I wondered if her home address were Disneyland or a junkyard kennel? It must surely be time for the US to back off the world scene, let the French continue to broker peace in that region. Putin would only smile and ignore such an uncomprimising toothless diatribe the alternative would be to say come and stop me Ms Rice.. then what would she do? The US is deeply in debt, has no friends is spent on the world stage and you doesn't have the troops finish the middle eastern fiasco let alone start another one in Russia.
It wouldn't be unpatriotic for Americans to say "Heck we've gone astray in last decade but we'll stay home for a while, work hard and we'll be back soon all the better for it.
Back on the sporting athletics track.. USA isn't going well.. amazing sprint races last night the finals are going to be great. Our one gold for ladies shot put was our moment.. yippee for Val.
China in the ladies gym are sensational... These games are wonderful.