05 Jan '06 12:34>1 edit
Originally posted by Omnislashi am afraid, my friend, that it was not my perception of god i was debating.It was the perception of danielpasono.
While I think it good and well you are 'putting the truth behind the myth up for debate', I require you to address my last statement directly if you wish to debate the matter.
My understanding of your position is that God can not exist as both creator and judge and maintain moral perfection. Am I correct in my understanding?
Additionally, it is dif ...[text shortened]... u identify God with? If not, then please say so plainly so I might understand your perception.
As for my own position, it is that god by definition, is creator, judge, jury, and executioner. There is nothing we can do to change that, except do good or bad and live with the moral consequences. our brain deals with conflicting messages as to what good and bad are, and bad people affect our judgement whether we like it or not.
we are all pawns.
does any of that make sense? i sure hope so