Originally posted by jaywill [b]Greg Koukl talks about whether the Atheists has any burden of proof.
This is a good critique of the definition of Atheism as "A non-belief in God. A lack of belief in God" I think, or the attitude - "I have no responsbility to present evidence or proof because I have no belief, no burden of evidence or of proof."
Originally posted by Suzianne This includes not only current sin, but past sin as well as the original sin man is born into.
The ridiculous things people believe are amazing. And I bet we could talk all day and you would make up more and more ridiculous stuff to try and defend this statement. But I also bet that you know that it doesn't make sense.
Originally posted by twhitehead The ridiculous things people believe are amazing. And I bet we could talk all day and you would make up more and more ridiculous stuff to try and defend this statement. But I also bet that you know that it doesn't make sense.
That's the miraculous and amazing thing you fail to understand.