Originally posted by rvsakhadeo
The word" seems" is there only because I am not aware of the exact reason as to why the skull bones are not closed at the time of the birth of the human baby. I have made a guess that it looks like a case of Fast Track Project Management on the part of God to let the baby go out and develop further bones outside the mother's body in order to cut down an u ...[text shortened]... ers also get pollinated by bees,this example of Evolution looks quite a bit absurd.
“...I have made a guess that it looks like a case of Fast Track Project Management on the part of God to let the baby go out and develop further bones outside the mother's body in order to cut down an unnecessarily long confinement. ...”
why can't evolution “ let the baby go out and develop further bones outside the mother's body in order to cut down an unnecessarily long confinement”?
“...Are guesses outlawed in the new papacy of science ? ...”
evidence/reason-based ones or ones based on silly superstition?
“...How does then the Evolution theory explain this ? By saying that" it just evolved that way" ? ...”
it “just evolved that way” because it helps to pass-on the genes. Delaying the birth of the baby to give more time for the bone to grow would have put extra burden on the mother and, of course, if the mother dies, the baby would die also and then both the mother and baby would not pass-on their genes.
“...the bees being able to see many more colours than humans or that matter other beings and thus pollinating flowers of these "invisible" colours also so that those particular trees having these flowers develop fruits. This is said to be a case of Evolution of the trees which develop these flowers visible only to the bees. ...”
there are no “flowers visible only to the bees.” . You mean “flowers with colours only visible to the bees”
“...How does the tree "know" what is visible to the bees ? ...”
they don't “know” what is visible to the bees. And they don't need to “know” anything for natural selection to work.
“...Evolutionary theory says that many types of flowers exist on many types of trees and those flowers the colours of which are visible only to the bees enable the survival of these types of trees also. ...”
correct.
“...Since many trees with "visible" flowers also get pollinated by bees,this example of Evolution looks quite a bit absurd. ...”
all flowers are “visible” but you mean “flowers with colours only visible to the bees” but I still don't follow you:
Those flowers that have only visible (to us) colours would get pollinated for exactly the same reason why those flowers that have additional invisible (to us) colours get pollinated. So what is “absurd” about that? The evolution of the colours of flowers does not discriminate between colours that are visible to us from those that are not because it is not WE who are pollinating them, it is the bees! So what colours are or are not visible to us as opposed to what colours are or are not visible to the bees is irrelevant!