16 May '11 16:37>4 edits
Originally posted by josephw“...Evolution is a theory developed by scientists using scientific methodology.
Evolution is a theory developed by scientists using scientific methodology.
Evolution isn't science. Jesus Agerg! Common'! You know it's a religion! 😛
God apparently is too complicated for you. lol
Evolution isn't science. ...”
if what you mean by the “Evolution isn't science” part above is “Evolution isn't a scientific theory” then that whole statement above is a contradiction because a theory developed using scientific methodology is, by definition (albeit usually implicitly so), a scientific theory. If that was not the case then what would distinguish a “scientific theory” from a “non-scientific theory”? (and can you give just one example of a verifiable scientific theory that cannot be developed using scientific methodology? -answer, no ).
but if what you mean by the “Evolution isn't science” part above is NOT “Evolution isn't a scientific theory” but “the PROCESS (NOT the theory) of Evolution isn't science” then neither Agerg nor anyone else is claiming the contrary.
but if what you mean by the “Evolution isn't science” part above in neither the above then what do you mean by “Evolution isn't science”?
“...God apparently is too complicated for you. Lol ...”
How would you like some of your own medicine? -here is some of your own medicine;
...and apparently the concept of science and rational thought is too complicated for you.
There is no cause to belittle people just for not agreeing with your opinion.