16 Oct '09 07:05>1 edit
Originally posted by robbie carrobieotherwise are you prepared to ignore this sexuality and think, oh that's not a gay bar, its just a persons bar, OK, the people who frequent it are gay, but hey they are gay persons who coincidently just happen to be congregating at this particular spot at this particular moment, and the bar has the designation gay bar, but its not really a gay bar, its just a bar with persons who happen to be gay, really Lemony, is this the way we should be thinking???
it seems that you missed out the fundamental point of it being designated a gay bar, by the very fact that the persons attending are gay, thus my dear lemony yellow, is their sexual orientation not a definitive reason of why they are there, why the bar happens to be there, and why it is termed a gay bar, thus it appears to me, that sexuality has inde bar with persons who happen to be gay, really Lemony, is this the way we should be thinking???
I read through this several times, but you're really just failing to make any sense. That gay persons are commonly subjected to pejorative designations and have to endure practices that highlight their sexuality beyond what is encountered by straights doesn't show that gay persons are, in any genuine way, "defined" by their sexuality any more than straight persons are defined by their sexuality. It only shows something regrettable about the prevailing social climate, regarding ignorance and bigotry. It shows that gays have to suffer more for their sexuality, for no good reason; it shows that gays are unfairly singled out more and excluded just by virtue of their sexuality.
You seem to think that gay persons are "defined" by their sexuality insofar as society makes a point to single them out expressly for it.