03 Feb '13 18:17>
Yes I judge the god of the bible using secular morality because secular morality is superior to religious morality.
Do you mean the same secular morality which sanctioned the 54 million killings of unborn infants since the 60s ?
Originally posted by sonshipIf you are talking about abortion (your a whack job fundi, of course your talking about abortion)Yes I judge the god of the bible using secular morality because secular morality is superior to religious morality.
Do you mean the same secular morality which sanctioned the 54 million killings of unborn infants since the 60s ?
Originally posted by googlefudgeThe problem is not with us redefining words, it is others who have made new words and have already redefined these words to make the murder of a baby in the womb of the mother seem moral. By redefining an unborn baby that is still in the womb with new words, like embryo and fetus, the abortionists make it seem less than a baby.
If you are talking about abortion (your a whack job fundi, of course your talking about abortion)
then abortion isn't (inherently) immoral.
However abortion does not involve killing "infants" unless you are going to radically redefine the
word to means something completely different.
Originally posted by RJHindsIf you claim a baby and a ball of cells are equal you do not elevate the ball of cells you diminish the baby.
The problem is not with us redefining words, it is others who have made new words and have already redefined these words to make the murder of a baby in the womb of the mother seem moral. By redefining an unborn baby that is still in the womb with new words, like embryo and fetus, the abortionists make it seem less than a baby.
http://www.babycenter.com/fetal-development-week-by-week
Originally posted by googlefudge
If you are talking about abortion (your a whack job fundi, of course your talking about abortion)
then abortion isn't (inherently) immoral.
However abortion does not involve killing "infants" unless you are going to radically redefine the
word to means something completely different.
If you are talking about abortion (your a whack job fundi, of course your talking about abortion) then abortion isn't (inherently) immoral.
However abortion does not involve killing "infants" unless you are going to radically redefine the word to means something completely different.
Originally posted by SuzianneIf god is a bastard, that means he had parents.....
Well, you are only approaching the idea from a different direction.
My apologies if this thread is not intended to eventually be "how can God be great when he's obviously a vicious lying murderous bastard"?
Originally posted by googlefudge
If you claim a baby and a ball of cells are equal you do not elevate the ball of cells you diminish the baby.
Abortion is an issue you are on the wrong side of (morally) and is not a problem for my mortality it's a
problem for yours.
If you claim a baby and a ball of cells are equal you do not elevate the ball of cells you diminish the baby.
Originally posted by sonshipIf you claim a baby and a ball of cells are equal you do not elevate the ball of cells you diminish the baby.
To claim the baby is equal to a ball of cells is really not to say that that is ALL the baby is. Could you yourself not also be discribed as a huge ball of cells?
I think you and I could be called a huge balls of living ce ...[text shortened]... ied out of faith, we have peace towards God through our Lord Jesus Christ." (Romans 5:1) [/b]
To claim the baby is equal to a ball of cells is really not to say that that is ALL the baby is
Originally posted by sonshipIf you are talking about abortion (your a whack job fundi, of course your talking about abortion) then abortion isn't (inherently) immoral.
What did you think I was talking about, several years of kids' picnics on the Good Ship Lollipop ?
If your conscience wasn't so dead as if seared with a hot iron then there wouldn't need to be ...[text shortened]... on such cases since the 1960s. Fifty four MILLION abortions ? Why not call that radical?
But what is radical, I think, is 54 million such cases since the 1960s. Fifty four MILLION abortions ? Why not call that radical?
If your conscience wasn't so dead as if seared with a hot iron ...