10 Jul '07 11:45>
Originally posted by NemesioSo you know of no texts from the first century that says that Christ was not resurrected? But we do have texts from the first century saying that he was resurrected, no?
And as for the last bit of information, what are some first century sources that say that Christ was not resurrected?
I dunno. Not many I guess. Did you read the part where I said that the Resurrection is a matter of
faith? I would never try to compel you to believe otherwise.
I didn't read this, but maybe this would help you:
http://www.inf ...[text shortened]... rrier/resurrection/
It sounds like someone who has done research into this issue.
Nemesio[/b]
Forgive me for not engaging a web site with the word "infidel" in it. I can give you two guesses as to who the author of it is. That is why I have tried to find the most neutral of sources which is Wiki. This is both good and bad in that Wiki is more objective than say a Muslim site or Christian site who have something to prove, however, Wiki has a finite amount of information on topics it covers, therefore, it makes researching certain topics problematic.