05 Nov '09 00:03>
Originally posted by robbie carrobieOf course i can see how this production might be provocative and insensitive to the religious feelings of others. I would suggest that this is probably the reason for perfomance of the play in the first place. When people follow a religion that claims this
ok Noobster, can you see, in any way shape of form, how this sort of so called 'art', might be provocative and insensitive to the religious feelings of others? it may be very hard to prove that it was not, and if that is the case, is it ok then for Donnie Davies who is a so called reformed homosexual to sing 'god hates fags', as posted by doctor scribbles? for it may be construed as art as well? it being in the genre of music.
"The penalty for homosexual acts is death to both parties. They have committed a detestable act, and are guilty of a capital offense." NLT Translation, Leviticus 20:13
When you also read Christian literature using words like, unnatural, abhorent, unclean, sinful, and perversion when talking about homosexuality i can see why the LGBT community might want to have a pop at Christianity.
But remember Robbie, gays like you Christians as people, it's just your beliefs they don't like.