08 Jun '09 03:38>
Originally posted by Andrew HamiltonIn any non-dualist thought (which, I think would include Aldous Huxley*), we are all manifestations of the whole: the “all-in-all without another”, the One, the Tao, the Brahman, the “totality that has no edge”, the cosmos, etc. There is not a “supernatural” entity that is somehow separate (or separable) from that whole. It is all a fluid figure-ground gestalt.
So am [b]I “DIVINE”? (note that I am just a humble atheist)[/b]
If one assigns some concept of divinity—whatever one means by that word—to the whole, then, of course, you are divine.
So the question becomes: How is [whoever] using that word “divine”?
“The divine reality you seek is your own mind.”
—Wolfgang Kopp, a non-theist Zen roshi. (Maybe he intends ‘divine’ in a tongue-in-cheek way.)
“No holiness, vast emptiness.”
—Bodhidharma
____________________________________________
* Which also raises the question of what the way of “devotion” might mean. I didn’t question that since I am a bit familiar with Huxley, and what it might mean, broadly, in a non-dualistic context.