1. Hmmm . . .
    Joined
    19 Jan '04
    Moves
    22131
    08 Jun '09 03:38
    Originally posted by Andrew Hamilton
    So am [b]I “DIVINE”? (note that I am just a humble atheist)[/b]
    In any non-dualist thought (which, I think would include Aldous Huxley*), we are all manifestations of the whole: the “all-in-all without another”, the One, the Tao, the Brahman, the “totality that has no edge”, the cosmos, etc. There is not a “supernatural” entity that is somehow separate (or separable) from that whole. It is all a fluid figure-ground gestalt.

    If one assigns some concept of divinity—whatever one means by that word—to the whole, then, of course, you are divine.

    So the question becomes: How is [whoever] using that word “divine”?

    “The divine reality you seek is your own mind.”
    —Wolfgang Kopp, a non-theist Zen roshi. (Maybe he intends ‘divine’ in a tongue-in-cheek way.)

    “No holiness, vast emptiness.”
    —Bodhidharma

    ____________________________________________

    * Which also raises the question of what the way of “devotion” might mean. I didn’t question that since I am a bit familiar with Huxley, and what it might mean, broadly, in a non-dualistic context.
  2. Cape Town
    Joined
    14 Apr '05
    Moves
    52945
    08 Jun '09 05:34
    Originally posted by karoly aczel
    So many questions...
    I will just say tha our true narure is divine however we are largley IGNORANT of it
    IF yo want to call me arrogant well, thats fine, no skin of my back
    So are we 'devine' simply by definition ( as seems to be implied by vistesd ) ?
    How does doing good works lead us to better knowledge of our 'true nature'? Does doing 'bad works' not lead to better knowledge?

    I personally think that it makes far more sense to say that better knowledge of our selves is likely to lead us to do good works.
  3. Hmmm . . .
    Joined
    19 Jan '04
    Moves
    22131
    08 Jun '09 05:48
    Originally posted by twhitehead
    So are we 'devine' simply by definition ( as seems to be implied by vistesd ) ?
    How does doing good works lead us to better knowledge of our 'true nature'? Does doing 'bad works' not lead to better knowledge?

    I personally think that it makes far more sense to say that better knowledge of our selves is likely to lead us to do good works.
    Vistesd knows that he has gone way out on a limb there that might not hold him. 🙂

    Under certain conceptions it would not be illogical to claim that you are “divine”.
  4. Cape Town
    Joined
    14 Apr '05
    Moves
    52945
    08 Jun '09 06:35
    If our divinity is not merely by definition, then how do we know of it? If it is a key attribute that tells us much about our 'true nature', then are we as 'largely ignorant' as karoly would have us believe?
  5. Standard memberkaroly aczel
    The Axe man
    Brisbane,QLD
    Joined
    11 Apr '09
    Moves
    102841
    10 Jun '09 04:56
    Originally posted by twhitehead
    If our divinity is not merely by definition, then how do we know of it? If it is a key attribute that tells us much about our 'true nature', then are we as 'largely ignorant' as karoly would have us believe?
    one who is aware that they are asleep already has one eye open....
  6. Joined
    17 Jun '09
    Moves
    1538
    06 Jul '09 17:21
    Not physically.

    We don't have a Divinity.
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree