Originally posted by no1marauder
A meaningless assertion. Taken to its logical extreme, it would rule out any type of scientific or metaphysical searching.
EDIT: Do you regard trying to find an explanation for why the "weak" force is at the level it is to be a waste of time because "the universe is the way it is"?
I agree that it rules out metaphysical* searching (I can’t say anything about science). Why is that a problem? If people want to indulge in metaphysical speculation, I have no more problem with that than I have with mythology—G-d knows I’ve done enough of both, and maybe will do more—as long as we own up to what we’re doing: myth and speculation.
So, “we’re here because we’re here because we’re here because we’re here...” (John Travolta as the archangel Michael, in the film “Michael” ). That’s only a problem when we want something more. When we want something more, we begin to use our faculties (aesthetic, imaginative, intellectual) to compose meaning; the problem, it seems to me is that we go astray when we deny that that is what we are doing. We really want to know (be given, discover as a fact) what
the “meaning of it all” is. Or the purpose.
So there is no purpose to the whole of it—to your existence or mine—except what we are challenged to make; and so we take up the challenge, some philosophically, some mythologically, some religiously. (BTW, “low-blow” hit to my friend here: does the Tao have a “purpose”?)
* It’s possible that I’m construing metaphysics too narrowly here, I admit.
Note: a physical explanation of the “weak force” is not the same as a metaphysical explanation of “why” we are here.