1. Joined
    12 Jul '08
    Moves
    13814
    26 Mar '20 17:20
    So do we know if the Curve is being flattened or not? What does the Curve look like if no measures were taken?
  2. R
    Standard memberRemoved
    Joined
    10 Dec '06
    Moves
    8528
    26 Mar '20 17:489 edits
    @eladar said
    So do we know if the Curve is being flattened or not? What does the Curve look like if no measures were taken?
    Refer to the paper you sighted: Page 7 Figure A.

    https://www.imperial.ac.uk/media/imperial-college/medicine/sph/ide/gida-fellowships/Imperial-College-COVID19-NPI-modelling-16-03-2020.pdf

    We are somewhere in between the first two tick marks on that graph.

    I think we can approximate f(t) right now because we are so early in this ( the population is basically constant at this point ) by solving the following:

    (320 x 10^6)*10^5 * t*f(t) = 1027( deaths as of 25th) - 780( deaths as of 24th)

    t = 6 ( from the origin of the graph - March 20th ) so f(t) is basically 0 at this time.

    And that agrees with the graph quite well, so seems too soon at this point to say.
  3. Standard memberDeepThought
    Losing the Thread
    Quarantined World
    Joined
    27 Oct '04
    Moves
    87415
    26 Mar '20 17:55
    @eladar said
    So do we know if the Curve is being flattened or not? What does the Curve look like if no measures were taken?
    There's a widget on the below New York Times article you can play with a slider that let's you vary the length of time people have to stay at home and practice these precautions. By doing this you can get a handle on what the curve will look like, what will happen with hospitalisations and how many will die.

    https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/03/25/opinion/coronavirus-trump-reopen-america.html?fbclid=IwAR1iP1k7gG8ESTAeALvmNCI0oyGnxAZrmU_4uOrI7EgCqQnxNaVeyFlQG9s
  4. R
    Standard memberRemoved
    Joined
    10 Dec '06
    Moves
    8528
    26 Mar '20 18:12
    @deepthought said
    There's a widget on the below New York Times article you can play with a slider that let's you vary the length of time people have to stay at home and practice these precautions. By doing this you can get a handle on what the curve will look like, what will happen with hospitalisations and how many will die.

    https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/03/25/opinion/coron ...[text shortened]... virus-trump-reopen-america.html?fbclid=IwAR1iP1k7gG8ESTAeALvmNCI0oyGnxAZrmU_4uOrI7EgCqQnxNaVeyFlQG9s
    I think that only works if you are a subscriber.
  5. Joined
    12 Jul '08
    Moves
    13814
    26 Mar '20 18:13
    @deepthought said
    There's a widget on the below New York Times article you can play with a slider that let's you vary the length of time people have to stay at home and practice these precautions. By doing this you can get a handle on what the curve will look like, what will happen with hospitalisations and how many will die.

    https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/03/25/opinion/coron ...[text shortened]... virus-trump-reopen-america.html?fbclid=IwAR1iP1k7gG8ESTAeALvmNCI0oyGnxAZrmU_4uOrI7EgCqQnxNaVeyFlQG9s
    Is that like the global warming models we had in the late 90's and early 2000's?
  6. R
    Standard memberRemoved
    Joined
    10 Dec '06
    Moves
    8528
    26 Mar '20 19:02
    @joe-shmo said
    Refer to the paper you sighted: Page 7 Figure A.

    https://www.imperial.ac.uk/media/imperial-college/medicine/sph/ide/gida-fellowships/Imperial-College-COVID19-NPI-modelling-16-03-2020.pdf

    We are somewhere in between the first two tick marks on that graph.

    I think we can approximate f(t) right now because we are so early in this ( the population is basically constant ...[text shortened]... at this time.

    And that agrees with the graph quite well, so seems too soon at this point to say.
    EDIT to Above Post: Please, just ignore this for now, I'm goofing it up...
  7. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    53223
    26 Mar '20 21:28
    @joe-shmo
    Any prediction as to inflection point? I assume you were right that it is a logistic curve.
  8. R
    Standard memberRemoved
    Joined
    10 Dec '06
    Moves
    8528
    26 Mar '20 22:11
    @sonhouse said
    @joe-shmo
    Any prediction as to inflection point? I assume you were right that it is a logistic curve.
    Its going to be a logistic curve, but my regression has been failing as I add more data ( I don't know why at this time ). The last time a model worked it predicted IP of March 31, 2300 Deaths. Because the model is now failing after adding more data, I wouldn't count on its accuracy.
  9. Standard memberDeepThought
    Losing the Thread
    Quarantined World
    Joined
    27 Oct '04
    Moves
    87415
    26 Mar '20 22:12
    @joe-shmo said
    I think that only works if you are a subscriber.
    I had to register to use it, but I didn't have to subscribe.
  10. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    53223
    27 Mar '20 00:13
    @joe-shmo
    Well the death count is 1100 now so 2300 is only a bit over twice, and we have 5 days, it may get WORSE than 2300.
  11. Joined
    12 Jul '08
    Moves
    13814
    27 Mar '20 00:171 edit
    @sonhouse said
    @joe-shmo
    Well the death count is 1100 now so 2300 is only a bit over twice, and we have 5 days, it may get WORSE than 2300.
    It definitely will.

    Since 60k is a top end flu season, what kind of number would be needed to say this is much worse than any flu season?

    90k would be a 50 percent above. How about 120k?
  12. R
    Standard memberRemoved
    Joined
    10 Dec '06
    Moves
    8528
    27 Mar '20 00:30
    @eladar said
    It definitely will.

    Since 60k is a top end flu season, what kind of number would be needed to say this is much worse than any flu season?

    90k would be a 50 percent above. How about 120k?
    I don't think we can look at it quite like that. We don't mitigate the Flu by shutting down the country.
  13. Joined
    12 Jul '08
    Moves
    13814
    27 Mar '20 00:321 edit
    @joe-shmo said
    I don't think we can look at it quite like that. We don't mitigate the Flu by shutting down the country.
    Which begs the question, how many lives are actually being saved by forced shut downs?

    Do you see your circular reasoning here?
  14. R
    Standard memberRemoved
    Joined
    10 Dec '06
    Moves
    8528
    27 Mar '20 02:073 edits
    @eladar said
    Which begs the question, how many lives are actually being saved by forced shut downs?

    Do you see your circular reasoning here?
    Right Now, I would say none. In the future I would suspect many lives will be saved.

    Its my understanding the primary objective with mitigation was not to contain the virus, containment was a forgone conclusion.

    The "life savings" comes from slowing the spread so that hospitals maintain the ability to treat. So long as we don't crash the economy and have people out in droves begging for food, that strategy seems logical. I think that is the big question, where is the tipping point. I suspect it will be decided to soon to protect corporate interests, but all in all its basically a "lose-lose less" scenario either way.
  15. Joined
    12 Jul '08
    Moves
    13814
    27 Mar '20 02:15
    @joe-shmo

    I disagree about the slowing. The general timeline for this thing was guessed. If you can slow down its growth by about a week, then you max out deaths with one fewer week of exponential growth.

    But yeah it also slows growth at the moment buying time to get medical supplies and ventilator production going, something that should have been done about 3 months ago.

    If CEO's knew enough to quit their job months ago, the government knew too.
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree