Originally posted by The Plumber
At the risk of letting the cat out of the bag....
I'm actually not a plumber. I'm a licensed professional engineer (mechanical) - the alias comes from the fact that I am in an extended home improvement project of replacing most of ...[text shortened]... safety factor" of 50%, and go with a radius of about 4.75 meters.
I too am an engineer (chemical - well, almost...I have 4 more months of work experience left before I can receive my professional designation), so it's good to get some perspective and experience from others in the field. I work in the environmental field, specifically waste, and I have seen some double-walled tanks. Never had the chance to fire a shotgun at a ballistic-proof tank yet! Maybe one day...
Most often a double-walled tank without a berm is sufficient for approval of a spill protection strategy provided it can capture 110% of the tank volume, but having a berm will definitely increase the safety factor. And you're right, the main concern is the capture and containment of the fluid, whether it travels by land, sea or air.
The radius of the barrier should be SQRT(11), because the tank itself rests on the ground and takes up PI m3 of containment space, but I think your safety-factor answer is quite reasonable as the double-walled tank will take care of any internal free jets. I still think loss of containment from splashing wouldn't be an issue unless you're trying to contain spilled flubber.