Knightmarish Blitzing The rook isn't necessarily a sacrafice...although it qualifies as an initial
loss of material for a tactical gain (which creates material gain of course).
Note: due to the PGN viewer's mispost, you don't get to see the Rook
taking the Knight which still resides on d5. 🙁
Not sure what the issue is with the PGN...the move is Nd7-f6... and its
input that way, but the Viewer moves the Knight from d5?... who knows
but small issue you'll want to of course omit.
Originally posted by Nowakowski [b]Knightmarish Blitzing The rook isn't necessarily a sacrafice...although it qualifies as an initial
loss of material for a tactical gain (which creates material gain of course).
Note: due to the PGN viewer's mispost, you don't get to see the Rook
taking the Knight which still resides on d5. 🙁
Not sure what the issue is with the PG ...[text shortened]... ves the Knight from d5?... who knows
but small issue you'll want to of course omit.
-GIN[/b]
Yes, that's funny with your pgn. Because of that I initially wanted to ask what was the point of R to d5 🙂
About my sac of R for N which you mentioned. I think that if white took the R with pawn, that would be a sac, wouldn't it? Because white;s other R is protected by the Q. Or am I missing something?
I think my main problem was I didn't see that blacks could do 21...Qg7. After 18...Ne5 I thought for a while whether I should sac or not. I didn't see that Qg7 and took 19.Nxg6.
Originally posted by Guych I think my main problem was I didn't see that blacks could do 21...Qg7. After 18...Ne5 I thought for a while whether I should sac or not. I didn't see that Qg7 and took 19.Nxg6.
Any comments on this, please? Am I right, or did I miss something more?
Sacs in blitz (no Q sacs)
06 Aug '09 20:544 edits
Back to Top