08 May '11 04:57>
April 2011 Banded Quartets I 1800+ is a tournament I entered and which has just started.I've wondered for some time about the Relative meaning of Ratings in the sense that a 2200 player with an Opponent Average Rating of 1500 say, is not as strong as another 2200 with an OAR of 1900.And that the percentage of wins to total games played is also an indication besides that shown by the Rating.
In my Group 1 I have,lucky me!, tigerking with a Rating of 2259,an OAR of 1584 and 79%; coneybrush with a Rating of 2152,an OAR of 1864 and 89%; and doco Rated 2007,OAR of 1552 and 67%. On these 2 other indicators I would say that coneybrush is clearly the stronger of the 3. Any opinions?
In my Group 1 I have,lucky me!, tigerking with a Rating of 2259,an OAR of 1584 and 79%; coneybrush with a Rating of 2152,an OAR of 1864 and 89%; and doco Rated 2007,OAR of 1552 and 67%. On these 2 other indicators I would say that coneybrush is clearly the stronger of the 3. Any opinions?