1. Sydney
    Joined
    24 Jun '08
    Moves
    55547
    07 Aug '08 10:58
    Can anyone please tell me how good different ratings are?
    How good is 1600, 1700, 1800 etc.

    What rating is a grand master?

    Thanks.
  2. Standard memberDragon Fire
    Lord of all beasts
    searching for truth
    Joined
    06 Jun '06
    Moves
    30390
    07 Aug '08 11:141 edit
    Originally posted by bobbyald
    Can anyone please tell me how good different ratings are?
    How good is 1600, 1700, 1800 etc.

    What rating is a grand master?

    Thanks.
    The FIDE ratings for titled players are

    FM 2300
    IM 2400
    GM 2500

    I believe players have to stay above these ratings for a minimum number of games (30 comes to mind) and achieve norms in appropriate tournaments plus pay a fee to FIDE.

    FIDE ratings are not directly comparable to RHP although there should be a rough correlation.


    As a rough guide below these elevated heights
    2000-2300 are strong county / club players;
    1800-2000 are good club players;
    1600-1800 are average club players;
    1400-1600 are improving players;
    1200-1400 are social players only;
    below 1200 are beginners.
  3. Standard memberwormwood
    If Theres Hell Below
    We're All Gonna Go!
    Joined
    10 Sep '05
    Moves
    10228
    07 Aug '08 13:021 edit
    As a rough guide below these elevated heights
    2000-2300 are strong county / club players;
    1800-2000 are good club players;
    1600-1800 are average club players;
    1400-1600 are improving players;
    1200-1400 are social players only;
    below 1200 are beginners.
    where does that put 'advanced beginners'? 🙂
  4. Account suspended
    Joined
    07 Feb '07
    Moves
    62961
    07 Aug '08 14:07
    On this site, a 1600 player is, like, really, really good. Like me.
  5. St. Paul, Minnesota
    Joined
    26 Mar '08
    Moves
    74043
    07 Aug '08 14:17
    I'll join the peanut gallery.... 1400-1600 is improving....well, does that mean that if a player stays in that range for his whole life that he'll be better in his next life? Or is it more like the logic of "new AND improved?"
  6. Joined
    12 Jul '08
    Moves
    13814
    07 Aug '08 14:24
    Ratings from site to site are different. Everything is relative to the strength of the people you are playing.

    1200 here is not the same as 1200 OTB which is not the same as 1200 at FICS. At FICS I'm a 1000 Blitz but 1300 Standard. I'd fall into two different categories at the same time using the numbers given above.
  7. Columbus, Ohio
    Joined
    29 Apr '08
    Moves
    19039
    07 Aug '08 14:28
    I think the idea is that, to play consistently at a 1400 level, a player usually has undertaken some degree of study. It's an assumption that a player who begins study will continue it, which should eventually result in a higher rating.

    Of course, I made all that up just now, so who knows? Me, I'm probably going to be a social player for life. My goal is to be a good one, otherwise I simply don't have the time or ambition to reach any serious level.
  8. Account suspended
    Joined
    07 Feb '07
    Moves
    62961
    07 Aug '08 14:55
    Take a look at the player tables, there are 19000+ players, take the top percentage of them that you would consider classifies them as being "good", and see where that rating puts them.

    That's a start, at least.
  9. ALG
    Joined
    16 Dec '07
    Moves
    6190
    08 Aug '08 17:07
    Originally posted by Eladar
    Ratings from site to site are different. Everything is relative to the strength of the people you are playing.

    1200 here is not the same as 1200 OTB which is not the same as 1200 at FICS. At FICS I'm a 1000 Blitz but 1300 Standard. I'd fall into two different categories at the same time using the numbers given above.
    You are an improving beginner 😉
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree