Originally posted by cmsMaster
Here's a Shirov game - which he won with some nice analysis afterwards - though nothing concrete is gained from it. I'll have to look for more analysis on the DMG though, if anybody has some it'd be nice to see.
http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1074916&kpage=2
Here is the game
[Event "Daugavpils"]
[Site "Daugavpils"]
[Date "1990.??.??"]
[EventDate "1990.??.??"]
[Round "?"]
[Result "1-0"]
[White "A Shirov"]
[Black "J Lapinski"]
[ECO "C37"]
[WhiteElo "?"]
[BlackElo "?"]
[PlyCount "34"]
1. e4 e5 2. f4 exf4 3. Nf3 g5 4. Bc4 g4 5. O-O gxf3 6. Qxf3 Qf6 7. e5 Qxe5 8.
Bxf7+ Kxf7 9. d4 Qxd4+ 10. Be3 Qf6 11. Bxf4 Ke8 12. Nc3 Nc6 13. Nd5 Qg6 14.
Rae1+ Be7 15. Bd6 Kd8 16. Qf8+ Bxf8 17. Bxc7# 1-0
And here is some analysis/recommendations and my responses to them
1)"Shredder also seems to think that black's defenses hold after 10. ... Qg7. For example, 11. Nc3 Nc6 12. Bxf4 Nf6 13. Nd5 d6 14. Bg3 Be7 15. Nxf6 Bxf6 16. Bh4 Rf8 17. Bxf6 Qg4 (-2.34 depth 14) where black remains up a clear piece."
But on 10...Qg7 as i have showed in this thread before white must reply 11.Qxf4+ with powerful attack.
2)"It is easy to defend (9...Qf5! and black is two pieces up)."
It is not so easy to defend, but after analysing this line I concluded that 9...Qf5 is the best for black – it can refute this line. But black must know how to play – I think it is not so easy to defend in OTB and even in CC without using engine.
3) “10. e3 g7 11. xf4+ f6 12. d4 e7 13. c3 g8 (eval -3.74; depth 13 ply; 2000M nodes)” (Crafty)
After 14.Qe4 Qg6(or g4 – otherwise white gets advantage) 15.Bxf6 Qxe4 16.Nxe4 Rybka evaluates this position about -0.90, - 1,00 but even engine cant find certain way to win for black. I would rate this position as unclear.
But I tend to agree with cmsMaster – double Muzio gambit isnt so sound as I thought.