1. Standard memberadam warlock
    Baby Gauss
    Ceres
    Joined
    14 Oct '06
    Moves
    18375
    25 Mar '08 11:321 edit
    Originally posted by tomtom232
    You didn't get it? You said, "I can't [b]stand to read what he writes"


    EDIT: and if you can't stand at all then it would logically follow that you wouldn't be able to stand to read what Silman writes.[/b]
    Of course I did get it...

    But...

    you see...

    the joke wasn't funny...

    Sorry to break it down like this for you...

    But I kinda (😛) like you and feel that I have to be honest with you...

    I've been drunk and I've been with drunk people... So I know a drunk joke when I hear one...
  2. Joined
    15 Jun '06
    Moves
    16334
    25 Mar '08 11:34
    Originally posted by adam warlock
    Of course I did get it...

    But...

    you see...

    the joke wasn't funny...

    Sorry to break it down like this for you...

    But I kinda (😛) like you and feel that I have to be honest with you...

    I've been drunk and I've been with drunk people... So I know a drunk joke when I hear one...
    It was a set up joke...it was going to lead even deeper...as in jokes about the reasons why you can't stand. 😛
  3. Standard memberadam warlock
    Baby Gauss
    Ceres
    Joined
    14 Oct '06
    Moves
    18375
    25 Mar '08 11:36
    Originally posted by tomtom232
    it was going to lead even deeper...
    Ok now you got me curious... I'm a sucker for crude humour...
    what should I say to get the follow up joke?
  4. Joined
    15 Jun '06
    Moves
    16334
    25 Mar '08 11:44
    Originally posted by adam warlock
    Ok now you got me curious... I'm a sucker for crude humour...
    what should I say to get the follow up joke?
    You should make your move in our game. 😛
  5. Standard memberadam warlock
    Baby Gauss
    Ceres
    Joined
    14 Oct '06
    Moves
    18375
    25 Mar '08 11:48
    Originally posted by tomtom232
    You should make your move in our game. 😛
    I'll lok at it then. I don't like my position.
  6. Joined
    15 Jun '06
    Moves
    16334
    25 Mar '08 11:53
    Originally posted by adam warlock
    I'll lok at it then. I don't like my position.
    I like your position. 😛
  7. Standard memberAttilaTheHorn
    Erro Ergo Sum
    In the Green Room
    Joined
    09 Jul '07
    Moves
    521900
    25 Mar '08 11:54
    Mate with K + B + N vs. K does happen. I've seen it twice, but not in my games, and in both cases the stronger side could not deliver mate before the 50 move rule kicked in. If you know this mate, you can achieve checkmate from the worst conceivable starting position in 34 moves.
    It's a great exercise to learn to coordinate all three pieces.
  8. Joined
    22 Nov '06
    Moves
    14089
    25 Mar '08 13:58
    yes, it happens
    Game 4297113
    oceancloud v platinumknight

    (still a few moves to go)
  9. Joined
    12 Feb '05
    Moves
    47202
    25 Mar '08 14:27
    Originally posted by ivan2908
    Accordion Silman there is no need for learning it since it never happens. 😞

    It is true that the chance of this endgame occuring in your games is really small, but it might just happen to you.

    A few months ago in an OTB team match this endgame showed up. My teammate was playing a lost rook vs knight & bishop (+ some pawns both side). At some point (I already had gone home when this happened) he traded the rook for his opponent's remaining pawn and ended up in this endgame. His opponent didn't know how to win this ending so he accepted a draw. He was nearly in tears, or so I heard.
  10. Pale Blue Dot
    Joined
    22 Jul '07
    Moves
    21637
    25 Mar '08 14:31
    Originally posted by cairn
    (still a few moves to go)
    100 ... Kh1
    101 Ne3 Kg1
    102 Nf1 Kh1
    103 Nh2 Kg1
    104 Bf1 Kh1
    105 Bg2+ Kg1
    106 Nf3#

    Is this the only mating position? (The books I have omit this mate).
  11. Joined
    19 Jun '06
    Moves
    847
    25 Mar '08 14:33
    I liked "Accordian Silman" much better than "According to Silman". Now I have this mental picture of Silman playing one of those squeezeboxes. 🙂

    The first (and only) large tournament that I played in had a KBN vs K game. I watched part of it. I was a tournament beginner, and it had to be explained to me just how rare these games are. BTW, the player successfully delivered mate, never having learned the procedure. He figured it out OTB!

    One of my recent engine-engine tournament games (1800 games) had a KBN vs K game, and the engine was able to deliver mate. (It wasn't using tablebases.) I've never tried to figure out what percentage of engine games are this type, although it would be an interesting statistic.
  12. Joined
    12 Feb '05
    Moves
    47202
    25 Mar '08 14:35
    Originally posted by Green Paladin
    100 ... Kh1
    101 Ne3 Kg1
    102 Nf1 Kh1
    103 Nh2 Kg1
    104 Bf1 Kh1
    105 Bg2+ Kg1
    106 Nf3#

    Is this the only mating position? (The books I have omit this mate).


    I think this is the most typical mate in this endgame.
  13. Joined
    08 May '07
    Moves
    55475
    25 Mar '08 23:507 edits
    ivan2908 vs mannie



    White to move.

    And Jeremy Silman says this doesn't happen in real games!! 🙂

    It just takes practice; you'll be ready the next time it happens.
  14. Under Cover
    Joined
    25 Feb '04
    Moves
    28912
    26 Mar '08 03:52
    I also didn't think that this endgame had any practical value. I learned it because petrovitch was going to make me stand in a corner if I didn't. It was very easy to learn, and I'm glad I did. I may never see this position in practical play in my life (after all, I've been playing this game for many years like most of you, and haven't seen it yet), but by learning it you will learn things about the interaction between B & N that can have lasting practical value. Besides that, I have to admit that it is a little bit of fun just knowing that I can finally do this.

    Learn it here:

    http://www.chessvideos.tv/forum/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=802&sid=97dc30486b8ede107f4345fdc2805ba4

    Practice it here:

    http://www.chessvideos.tv/bishop-knight-checkmate.php

    Never complain about it again.
  15. Standard memberwargamer66
    Steve B.
    Salt Lake City
    Joined
    08 Sep '06
    Moves
    38353
    26 Mar '08 04:43
    Originally posted by schakuhr
    It is true that the chance of this endgame occuring in your games is really small, but it might just happen to you.

    A few months ago in an OTB team match this endgame showed up. My teammate was playing a lost rook vs knight & bishop (+ some pawns both side). At some point (I already had gone home when this happened) he traded the rook for his opponent's ...[text shortened]... dn't know how to win this ending so he accepted a draw. He was nearly in tears, or so I heard.
    A buddy of mine did this exact same stunt in a high school match and secured a draw. This was over 20 years ago though, and I've never seen it happen since...

    Not sure of the utility of learning this endgame overall. I get into tons of rook endings, I think my time is better spent there.
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree