"Wot, both of 'em? Not much filler there, I'm afraid."
I can pad it out with games you should have lost and then games should have won.
I have established you have that excellent book
Tartakower & Du Mont's 500.
Every library should have a copy, infact a chess library need only contain
this one book to turn your avergae joe into a chess player.
But you have to read it, study it, devour it....
Game 111 Faktor - Rubinstein, the note after Black's 60th move.
It starts 'Most instructive for the beginner - is as follows'.
Warning you that even the most easily won looking endings hide miracles.
The first game of yours I looked at (a draw).
I discovered you should have lost and then should have won.
First we look at a position in the game you should have lost.
M Ivan - moonbus RHP 2013 Game 9834715
White should have played 15.Bxc1 instead of 15,Qxc1 that appears to be easily winning for White.
That is the win White missed. Same game, many moves later. The miracle I mentioned earlier.
Black (Moonbus) to play.
Black played 33...f5 and the game was drawn, Whte cannot get his King in.
Black should have saved up f5 as tempo burner and the Black King gets in.
[FEN "8/8/p2k1p2/1p1p3p/1P1K1p1P/P4P2/8/8 b - - 0 1"]
1... Ke6 2. Kc3 Ke5 3. Kd3 d4 4. Kd2 Kd5 5. Kd3 {I've aimed deliberatly for here because this position appeared in the game except the f6 pawn was on f5 and with Black to play he discovered he could not get and the game was drawn.} 5... f5 {The tempo waster.} 6. Kd2 Kc4 {The Black King is in.}