29 Nov '07 15:49>1 edit
wow...his post got deleted quick!
Originally posted by chessisvanityf....ck you, cruel s... of a bi..h
what were his "tips" ??
mine were....."kill everything that moves....men...women...and kids"
thats how you win a war.....the united states hasn't won a war since WWII why?....because now they only shoot the guys with guns....stupid.
Originally posted by Northern LadWell Kasparov has been fine so far and has opposed Putin pretty strongly. The thing that concerns me is that, like all political oppositions, he has plenty of things he thinks are wrong with the govornment but few practical ideas of what to change to better run the country. That is why I think he wont get voted in, as the old saying goes - if its not broken it doesnt need fixing?
Because they are well substantiated by respected international humanitarian organisations. Some people just don't seem able to face the facts. Maybe you think all the murdered opposition figures are just 'rumours' too.
Originally posted by TyrannosauruschexHe should have bought a vowel earlier. 😵
It reminds me of that south park episode with wheel of fortune - the clue is "People that annoy you"
N_GGERS
The answer turns out to be naggers, after the more obvious word is said.
Originally posted by TyrannosauruschexAs it happens, Kasparov has produced numerous tracts on economics and politics, which one may agree or disagree with depending on one's point of view. It's certainly a safe bet that he won't be voted in, because he, like most of the opposition, is not allowed to stand in the election! Of course, he wouldn't win anyway, since the media, and in particular the broadcast media, are almost entirely under Kremlin control.
Well Kasparov has been fine so far and has opposed Putin pretty strongly. The thing that concerns me is that, like all political oppositions, he has plenty of things he thinks are wrong with the govornment but few practical ideas of what to change to better run the country. That is why I think he wont get voted in, as the old saying goes - if its not broken it doesnt need fixing?
Originally posted by Northern LadI am convinced that Kasparov faked the "chessboard attack" incident -- which he also blamed on Putin. After that, I cannot regard Kasparov as sincere. In my mind, Kasparov is not primarily a political activist, but rather a politician, who declared his candidacy for the same office which Putin now holds, the Russian Presidency, in the 2008 election. All of his monkeyshines must be regarded as acts of political theater.
I have never been a particular admirer of Kasparov the person, as opposed to Kasparov the chess player, but I think you are being grossly unfair to him in your post. It takes real guts to be a prominent opponent of Putin, seeing that a considerable number of them have already been murdered, almost certainly by Putin's shady security services.
Originally posted by Mark AdkinsWhat utter contemptible drivel you write. So all the brave opponents of Putin whose lives finished in a hail of bullets (or worse) timed their own murders to discredit him? It is a matter of fact that the British police have compelling evidence that the murder of Litvinenko was indeed an official Russian hit and want to try the main suspect, Lugovoi, in Britain, but of course that won't happen.
I am convinced that Kasparov faked the "chessboard attack" incident -- which he also blamed on Putin. After that, I cannot regard Kasparov as sincere. In my mind, Kasparov is not primarily a political activist, but rather a politician, who declared his candidacy for the same office which Putin now holds, the Russian Presidency, in the 2008 election. A ble, at the worst possible times (e.g., on the eve of an important world political summit).
Originally posted by Northern LadIs that what I wrote? Or are you the driveler? Why do you write like a third-rate propagandist? Are you an editorialist for The Daily Telegraph, or did you simply watch too many episodes of Danger Man whilst crawling in your nappy?
What utter contemptible drivel you write. So all the brave opponents of Putin whose lives finished in a hail of bullets (or worse) timed their own murders to discredit him?
Originally posted by Mark AdkinsDon't be so pathetic and childish. It is you who has no interest in finding out about the real situation in Russia and act as a propagandist for an increasingly dictatorial and authoritarian regime, exposed as such by independent international human rights organisations and most of the well-informed liberal media. And as a left-of-centre liberal, I find it a joke that I might have anything to do with a newspaper like the Torygraph. Mind you, I shudder to think what your reading matter might be...
Is that what I wrote? Or are you the driveler? Why do you write like a third-rate propagandist? Are you an editorialist for The Daily Telegraph, or did you simply watch too many episodes of Danger Man whilst crawling in your nappy?
Originally posted by Northern LadYour idea of civilized discourse seems to have been dictated by a first form public school teacher. I can almost hear the tiresome drone of your hysterical, nasal voice indulging in shrill ad hominem at every opportunity.
Don't be so pathetic and childish. It is you who has no interest in finding out about the real situation in Russia and act as a propagandist for an increasingly dictatorial and authoritarian regime, exposed as such by independent international human rights organisations and most of the well-informed liberal media. And as a left-of-centre liberal, I foun ...[text shortened]... newspaper like the Torygraph. Mind you, I shudder to think what your reading matter might be...