30 Jun '07 05:23>
Hey, guys! I was wondering what is your opinion on the Alekhine Defence (1.e4 Nf6), whether you play this opening or not.
Originally posted by ivan2908Yes, it is a ploy to make White over-extend his center. Black actually tries to prove that White's preponderance of central pawns is, in fact, weak. Think of an army over-extending its supply lines. It's a fun "hyper-modern opening," yet there are MANY dangerous tactical chances.
I think on purpose. Black often allows to white to establish imposing pawn center to create targets for himself which he can attack later.
Originally posted by AlphaAlekhineehhh... four pawns goes:
Yes, it is a ploy to make White over-extend his center. Black actually tries to prove that White's preponderance of central pawns is, in fact, weak. Think of an army over-extending its supply lines. It's a fun "hyper-modern opening," yet there are MANY dangerous tactical chances.
If you choose to play this against 1. e4, be prepared for the natur ll know how to face it as White. It creates some very rich and enjoyable games. Have fun!
Originally posted by c guy1Yes, I stand corrected. I've always made Nc6 there instead of d6, with about 50-50 success. I'll usually play d6 or e6 a move or two later.
ehhh... four pawns goes:
1.e4 Nf6 2. e5 Nd5 3. c4 Nb6 4. d4 d6! 5. f4
At this point, white is often considered inferior.
5.....dxe5 6.fxe5 (dxe5? Qxd1+). Now from here it is black's chance to prove the opening. Ideas range from 6...c5 (I dont prefer this system) attacking whites center rapidly or 6....g6 7...Bg7 8.....c5 to continue development, then a ...[text shortened]... onally like 4...dxe5 followed by 5. Nxe5 g6 with the idea of Bg7 and c5, weakening the diagnol.