1. Joined
    18 Apr '06
    Moves
    31699
    28 Aug '07 15:52
    I was wondering why 3.e5 is not played against the Sicilian, e.g. after 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 Nc6/d6/e6 3.e5. Anyone willing to explain the positional implications?
  2. Joined
    19 Feb '05
    Moves
    6190
    28 Aug '07 16:29
    Because it gives up the d5 square and accomplishes nothing.
  3. 127.0.0.1
    Joined
    27 Oct '05
    Moves
    158564
    28 Aug '07 16:371 edit
    Originally posted by badivan1
    I was wondering why 3.e5 is not played against the Sicilian, e.g. after 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 Nc6/d6/e6 3.e5. Anyone willing to explain the positional implications?
    1. e4 c5
    2. Nf3 d6
    3. d4 e5?
    4. dxe5, dxe5
    5. Qxd8+, Kxd8
    6. Nxe5

    or
    1. e4 c5
    2. Nf3 Nc6
    3. d4 e5?
    4. dxe5, Nxe5
    5. Qxd8+, Kxd8
    6. Nxe5

    Edit: it's not positional, it just loses material.
  4. Joined
    17 May '05
    Moves
    6676
    28 Aug '07 16:46
    Originally posted by zebano
    1. e4 c5
    2. Nf3 d6
    3. d4 e5?
    4. dxe5, dxe5
    5. Qxd8+, Kxd8
    6. Nxe5

    or
    1. e4 c5
    2. Nf3 Nc6
    3. d4 e5?
    4. dxe5, Nxe5
    5. Qxd8+, Kxd8
    6. Nxe5

    Edit: it's not positional, it just loses material.
    white, not black, moves 3.e5
  5. Under ur ChessBoard!
    Joined
    12 Feb '07
    Moves
    2944
    28 Aug '07 16:47
    Originally posted by badivan1
    I was wondering why 3.e5 is not played against the Sicilian, e.g. after 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 Nc6/d6/e6 3.e5. Anyone willing to explain the positional implications?
    It is played when black plays 2..Nf6, ie. 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.e5..
  6. 127.0.0.1
    Joined
    27 Oct '05
    Moves
    158564
    28 Aug '07 16:551 edit
    Originally posted by Regicidal
    white, not black, moves 3.e5
    ahh that makes more sense. I was thinking of an accelerated najdorf.
  7. Joined
    05 Aug '07
    Moves
    1638
    28 Aug '07 17:01
    There's an obscure line with e5 in the Bb5 sicilian,moscow variation:

    1.e4,c5 2.Nf3,d6 3.Bb5+,Nc6 4.e5?,Bd7 5.exd6,e6 6.Bxc6,Bxc6 7.Ne5,Qxd6 8.Nxc6,Qxc6 9.0-0,Nf6 =+

    This has also been tried:
    1.e4,c5 2.Nf3,d6 3.e5?,dxe5 4.Nxe5,Nf6 Eikelboom - Van Delft,07-20-2000
    Black won 😉
  8. Seattle
    Joined
    30 Jan '06
    Moves
    26370
    28 Aug '07 21:14
    it seems to me that the following will happen positionally: White will have more space, but the pawn will be extremely over stretched this early on. Black would probably play Nc6 quickly, preventing a quick d4, all the while trying to work on that lonely e pawn. Because the knight is on f3, the f pawn cant help.

    Random, unanalyzed though: If white played 2. e5, then 3.f4, 4. Nf3, then things might be different, but I haven't put any thought into it, so don't flame me.
  9. Joined
    02 Feb '07
    Moves
    394
    29 Aug '07 00:211 edit
    In the March 2005 issue of Chess Life, the subject of GM Susan Polgar's column Opening Secrets is the line 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e5. Her conclusion was that Black can equalize with proper play, but that some natural looking (but incorrect) lines could put Black in some difficulties.
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree