define theoretical move/opening chess theory

define theoretical move/opening chess theory

Only Chess

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.

e
leperchaun messiah

thru a glass onion

Joined
19 Apr 03
Moves
16870
17 Jul 08

please also post some examples of theoretical games. This is some fall-out from another thread.

i

Joined
26 Jun 06
Moves
59283
17 Jul 08
1 edit

Originally posted by eldragonfly
please also post some examples of theoretical games. This is some fall-out from another thread.
that is a good question.
i dont think i can explain but my example would be the carokann main line where white plays 6.h4 (edit:it might be 7.h4 cant remember)

e
leperchaun messiah

thru a glass onion

Joined
19 Apr 03
Moves
16870
18 Jul 08

e4

Joined
06 May 08
Moves
42492
18 Jul 08

Originally posted by eldragonfly
please also post some examples of theoretical games.
As I understand it a theoretical game is a game that follows accepted
opening theory as laid down in an opening manuel.

Players are said to be following theory if the game takes a path that
is well known and can be found in any number of opening books.

But a theorectical game - a complete game?

There are quite a few well known short games that Masters use to
settle for a breeze draw when they wish to conserve their energy
and take a 'time-out'.

Here is an example in the Pirc discovered by Seirawan.
This theorectical game has been played a few times to share the point.

i

Joined
26 Jun 06
Moves
59283
18 Jul 08

Originally posted by eldragonfly
[pgn]1.e4 c6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 dxe4 4.Nxe4 Bf5 5.Ng3 Bg6 6.h4 h6 7.Nf3
Nd7[/pgn]
yeah thats theory to me.. that whole line you wouldnt see someone just sit down and play if they didnt know the preexisting works behind it, it took a few tries before GMs went to the H pawn push, and theres a few other unique features of that line,.. the bizzareness of the caro lured me in

London

Joined
04 Nov 05
Moves
12606
18 Jul 08

In practical terms the application of theory over the board = memorisation.

d

Joined
29 Mar 07
Moves
1260
18 Jul 08

I think the marshall gambit has many games that could fit in this category. It's very long and deep.

S

Joined
14 Jul 06
Moves
20541
18 Jul 08
1 edit

I'm playing the Classical Main Line of the Morra Gambit (I'm White) against a very foxy opponent at the moment

S

Joined
14 Jul 06
Moves
20541
18 Jul 08

Main Line King's Gambit - Kieseritsky going on in this game in progress.

Black Beastie

Scheveningen

Joined
12 Jun 08
Moves
14606
18 Jul 08

Originally posted by Mahout
In practical terms the application of theory over the board = memorisation.
I think that the application of theory over the board is associated more with the deep knowledge of the theory itself than the mere memorisation of the theory. When you study great and well annotated games you see immediately how the masters strive to bring up all the hidden resources of the position. This proccess is far more sophisticated in CC coz we are not under time pressure and we really have the chance to create ultra complicated situations. Thanks to this site and to strong opponents like Arj14, twes and Watergeus I gradually start to play cautiously, and I hope that soon I will overcome my OTB attitude for fast replies;

BTW: eldragonfly, how nice to see you posting a fruitful thread;