WT Op Ed: Hiding the true cost of Obamacare

WT Op Ed: Hiding the true cost of Obamacare

Debates

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.

silicon valley

Joined
27 Oct 04
Moves
101289
22 Mar 10

http://washingtontimes.com/news/2010/mar/19/hiding-the-true-cost-of-obamacare/

Friday, March 19, 2010

EDITORIAL: Hiding the true cost of Obamacare

Nationalized health care will mean fewer people are covered

By THE WASHINGTON TIMES

President Obama keeps saying America needs the Democrats' health care bill to reduce costs. In reality, the government takeover of health care will raise costs and cause a large number of people to lose their health insurance.

"Well, if [the health care bill] doesn't pass, I'm more concerned about what it does to families out there who right now are getting crushed by rising health care costs and small businesses who were having to make a decision, 'Do I hire or do I fix health care?' " Mr. Obama claimed to Fox News on Wednesday.

Saying his bill will reduce costs doesn't make it true. Take the legislation's huge $500 billion cuts in Medicare. The government already reimburses hospitals and doctors less than their costs. Further cuts mean even more cost shifting to privately insured patients to cover deeper Medicare losses. Private insurance won't cover all of these exorbitant losses, which will force many doctors and hospitals out of business.

This week, the New England Journal of Medicine released a survey of doctors showing that 46.3 percent of "primary care physicians (family medicine and internal medicine) feel that the passing of health reform will either force them out of medicine or make them want to leave medicine." Not only will doctors leave medicine, but "27 percent [of physicians] would recommend medicine as a career but not if health reform passes." The survey is merely suggestive, but if the real reduction in the number of doctors is even 5 percent or 10 percent, medical costs will rise significantly. A lower supply of doctors amid rising demand for care means higher medical prices.

Another example is the ban on insurance companies charging different premiums based on pre-existing health conditions. Imagine what would happen if motorists could buy auto insurance after an accident and were allowed to drop it once a car was fixed. People would wait until they were in an accident to buy insurance, and insurance premiums would skyrocket. The same will happen if insurance companies can't charge higher premiums for sick people.

...

silicon valley

Joined
27 Oct 04
Moves
101289
22 Mar 10

...

Even the few purported cost-reducing measures in the Senate bill are being gutted by the president's proposal. The reconciliation bill delays a tax on high-quality insurance, dubbed Cadillac plans. The idea was if the cost of insurance was raised, fewer people would want such extensive medical coverage and thus would not seek medical care as often. Reduced demand therefore would reduce the price of medical care. But after striking a deal with unions, Mr. Obama decided to delay the tax for eight years, until he's out of office.

The Democrats' plan will destroy American health care. Obamacare will dramatically raise the cost of medical care, forcing many Americans to drop their insurance. Responsible members of Congress have to vote this down.

silicon valley

Joined
27 Oct 04
Moves
101289
22 Mar 10

and .... the NYT!

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/21/opinion/21holtz-eakin.html

Op-Ed Contributor
The Real Arithmetic of Health Care Reform

By DOUGLAS HOLTZ-EAKIN
Published: March 20, 2010

Arlington, Va.

ON Thursday, the Congressional Budget Office reported that, if enacted, the latest health care reform legislation would, over the next 10 years, cost about $950 billion, but because it would raise some revenues and lower some costs, it would also lower federal deficits by $138 billion. In other words, a bill that would set up two new entitlement spending programs — health insurance subsidies and long-term health care benefits — would actually improve the nation’s bottom line.

Could this really be true? How can the budget office give a green light to a bill that commits the federal government to spending nearly $1 trillion more over the next 10 years?

The answer, unfortunately, is that the budget office is required to take written legislation at face value and not second-guess the plausibility of what it is handed. So fantasy in, fantasy out.

In reality, if you strip out all the gimmicks and budgetary games and rework the calculus, a wholly different picture emerges: The health care reform legislation would raise, not lower, federal deficits, by $562 billion.

Gimmick No. 1 is ...

HG

Joined
22 Jun 08
Moves
8801
22 Mar 10

Hey Zeeblebot, new idea for your face.......... Crazy Horse?

silicon valley

Joined
27 Oct 04
Moves
101289
22 Mar 10

Originally posted by Hugh Glass
Hey Zeeblebot, new idea for your face.......... Crazy Horse?
did it come thru OK? on my browser it shows up as blank (white) so i thought RHP failed the upload.

it's a traditional irish jack-o-lantern, superimposed on the pleiades.

HG

Joined
22 Jun 08
Moves
8801
22 Mar 10

Originally posted by zeeblebot
did it come thru OK? on my browser it shows up as blank (white) so i thought RHP failed the upload.

it's a traditional irish jack-o-lantern, superimposed on the pleiades.
Naw not there,,, yet

silicon valley

Joined
27 Oct 04
Moves
101289
22 Mar 10

i'll try again sometime with IE.

silicon valley

Joined
27 Oct 04
Moves
101289
22 Mar 10

thanks