rating calculated at beginning or end.

rating calculated at beginning or end.

Help

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.

p

Joined
23 Dec 05
Moves
141
12 Feb 06

I started a game with someone that had a rating of ~1300 and while our game has proceeded his ranking has fallen to ~1050. If i win the game will the 1300 be used or the 1050, in the calculations.

Sais

Berks.

Joined
27 Nov 04
Moves
41991
12 Feb 06

Whatever it is at the finish.

c
Copyright ©2001-2006

Eastbourne

Joined
20 Sep 04
Moves
16434
12 Feb 06
1 edit

edit. false information.

sorry

N

The sky

Joined
05 Apr 05
Moves
10385
12 Feb 06

Don't listen to celticcountry, he is just trying to confuse you. The ratings at the end of the game are used to calculate the new ratings.

c
Copyright ©2001-2006

Eastbourne

Joined
20 Sep 04
Moves
16434
12 Feb 06

oh. i thought there was a vote a little while ago and itr was decided to go from the begining. sorry.

DS

Joined
22 Aug 05
Moves
26450
12 Feb 06

It doesn't seem fair that a player can manipulate his rating and thus affect his opponents rating loss or gain. And for that reason I would have voted for the calculation to be from the start ratings.
Maybe we will have a revote this year.

c
Copyright ©2001-2006

Eastbourne

Joined
20 Sep 04
Moves
16434
12 Feb 06

i dont think you were vote enabled.

DS

Joined
22 Aug 05
Moves
26450
12 Feb 06

Originally posted by celticcountry
i dont think you were vote enabled.
Ah, good thinking Batman. 🙂

p

Joined
23 Dec 05
Moves
141
13 Feb 06

Thanks for the information
and i will add that i must agree that i should be at the beginning of the game not the end. So it goes.

R

Edmonton, Alberta

Joined
25 Nov 04
Moves
2101
16 Feb 06

It can't be done using beginning ratings since this is a CC site and the games take forever to finish compared to OTB games.

Search around and you will find the solution.

DS

Joined
22 Aug 05
Moves
26450
16 Feb 06

Originally posted by RahimK
It can't be done using beginning ratings since this is a CC site and the games take forever to finish compared to OTB games.
So you are saying it can't be done because the games take a long time to finish, sometimes. I can't see how that means it can't be done.....if that was true why did they bother having a vote on it. IMO the best idea would be to use the average rating over the time the game was played.

For RHP addons...

tinyurl.com/yssp6g

Joined
16 Mar 04
Moves
15013
16 Feb 06

Originally posted by Dr Strangelove
So you are saying it can't be done [b] because the games take a long time to finish, sometimes. I can't see how that means it can't be done.....if that was true why did they bother having a vote on it. IMO the best idea would be to use the average rating over the time the game was played.[/b]
It's a good alternative but it wasn't an option in the vote.

As for having the score taken at the start of the game. IMO, it only needs 1 scenario to show why it wouldn't work. A 2000 player goes down to 1000. He starts 100 games against 1800s. After winning those 100 games, and winning 32 points for each, he is now rated 4200.

D

DS

Joined
22 Aug 05
Moves
26450
16 Feb 06

Originally posted by Ragnorak
A 2000 player goes down to 1000. He starts 100 games against 1800s. After winning those 100 games, and winning 32 points for each, he is now rated 4200.
But,am I not right in thinking that as his rating went up the points awarded would decrease, enough that when he reached 2000 against 1800 he would only be receiving 6 or 7 points. And it would continue to diminish the higher he got until he would be getting zero for beating a player something like 4-500 points below him.
Thats the way I understand anyhow.

For RHP addons...

tinyurl.com/yssp6g

Joined
16 Mar 04
Moves
15013
16 Feb 06

Originally posted by Dr Strangelove
But,am I not right in thinking that as his rating went up the points awarded would decrease, enough that when he reached 2000 against 1800 he would only be receiving 6 or 7 points. And it would continue to diminish the higher he got until he would be getting zero for beating a player something like 4-500 points below him.
Thats the way I understand anyhow.
Not if he starts all the games at once, and rating points are awarded based on the ratings at the start of the games.

D

DS

Joined
22 Aug 05
Moves
26450
16 Feb 06

Originally posted by Ragnorak
Not if he starts all the games at once, and rating points are awarded based on the ratings at the start of the games.

D
Yeah that's true. Average would be fairest then methinks, but too much aggro to set up I guess.