MORE CLANMEMBERS

I wouldn't even create a clan unless I knew I could get enough members. I thinks it pretty pointless to have so many members into one clan unless for bragging rights. But when Russ fineshes the clan league will there be a set max. to how many members you can have in a clan?

Of the 170 clans we have at the present moment, 42 of them have only one member. This seems absurd to me. That's about 25% of the clans with just one member. 93 clans (55% ) have three people, or less. Instead of having everyone start a new clan all the time, couldn't we have them assume the leadership of one of the dormant clans instead? They could rename it and rehabilitate it instead of having it lie around dormant, clogging the clan pages. Clans like Closed, Rip, and Really Lost are all inactive. Instead of having someone start a new clan the next time the fancy strikes them, why can't they be given the leadership of one of these clans?

i think the current situation is a good one regarding clans. any larger than 20 members and you end up having armies. i like the idea of having a clan where everyone knows each other, and honestly that just won't happen in anything larger than 20 or so.

Perhaps it would help that a clan needs to have at least three or five members to play clanchallenges. It would encourage people to join other clans instead of creating one themselves. You could also put a maximum to the number of clans.

The problem with the current ratingsystem for clans is that it is very dependent on the number of challenges you play.

Originally posted by Fiathahel
Perhaps it would help that a clan needs to have at least three or five members to play clanchallenges. It would encourage people to join other clans instead of creating one themselves. You could also put a maximum to the number of clans.

The problem with the current ratingsystem for clans is that it is very dependent on the number of challenges you play.