Originally posted by wolfgang59You have less than a pea-brain?
The answer is not obvious.
It is a very deep question which science is getting closer and closer to unravelling.
When Creationists can give an equitable answer to where
their "god" came from then we can have a sensible debate.
What you mean by "obvious" is "what my pea-brain can understand".
God has always existed. Can you wrap your "less than a pea-brain" around that?
1 edit
Originally posted by wolfgang59Asked and answered.
Tell you what.
You answer the questions put forth on this thread first, and I'll respond to your inquiry.
Please don't think for a second that it's forgotten, how long you failed to answer the question put to you.
You were asked
REPEATEDLY
to articulate the formula used to calculate the curvature of the earth.
You never supplied the answer.
We can all speculate WHY you never responded, but the fact is...
you never did.
Now: answer the questions put forth now several times, i.e., WHY HAS NASA LIED, and HOW ARE OBJECTS WHICH SHOULD BE BELOW THE HORIZON VISIBLE or just move on, admitting you have nothing to add.
Originally posted by FreakyKBHAll answered.
Asked and answered.
Please don't think for a second that it's forgotten, how long you failed to answer the question put to you.
You were asked
[b]REPEATEDLY
to articulate the formula used to calculate the curvature of the earth.
You never supplied the answer.
We can all speculate WHY you never responded, but the fact is... ...[text shortened]... SHOULD BE BELOW THE HORIZON VISIBLE[/b][/i] or just move on, admitting you have nothing to add.[/b]
Originally posted by sonhouseWith scathing and brilliant insight such as that, who could possibly offer a rejoinder?
YOU are the assshole not believing 400 years of science. They don't have to provide you with ANYTHING. You have a bitch, YOU put up your evidence. We KNOW what Earth AND Antarctica looks like.
Put aside what you think you know and answer the two questions.
WHY DOES NASA LIE & HOW ARE WE ABLE TO SEE DISTANT OBJECTS WHICH SHOULD BE BELOW THE HORIZON?
Originally posted by FreakyKBHWHY DOES NASA LIE & HOW ARE WE ABLE TO SEE DISTANT OBJECTS WHICH SHOULD BE BELOW THE HORIZON?
With scathing and brilliant insight such as that, who could possibly offer a rejoinder?
Put aside what you think you know and answer the two questions.
[b]WHY DOES NASA LIE & HOW ARE WE ABLE TO SEE DISTANT OBJECTS WHICH SHOULD BE BELOW THE HORIZON? [/b]
Because they don't want us to know the earth is flat.
That's the only answer I can think of. 😉
Originally posted by josephwOr just this bare insignificant not even worth of mention, the tiny possibility that oh, I don't know, that EARTH IS FRIGGING ROUND NOT FLAT?
[b]WHY DOES NASA LIE & HOW ARE WE ABLE TO SEE DISTANT OBJECTS WHICH SHOULD BE BELOW THE HORIZON?
Because they don't want us to know the earth is flat.
That's the only answer I can think of. 😉[/b]