Dasein-in-the-world

If you can grasp *from a first read* how present-at-hand can
turn to readiness-to-hand without inference, I shall, hereby,
crown you King of mit-Dasein.

Heidegger. Who translated it into English?

Originally posted by vandervelde
Heidegger. Who translated it into English?

Heidegger was confused. It doesn't matter whether in German or in translation.

So was Derrida. Don't bother.

Originally posted by moonbus
Don't bother.

Originally posted by Seitse
If you can grasp *from a first read* how present-at-hand can
turn to readiness-to-hand without inference, I shall, hereby,
crown you King of mit-Dasein.

Originally posted by Ponderable
Meinst Du jetzt das Da-sein als so-sein oder in der Seinsheit des Seins?

Da musst Du in deinem in-der-Welt-sein das geworfen-sein in der seinsheit des Anderen als Expletierung des Impliziten mitdenken!

(I won't translate that, but it certainly is Heideggerish)

Originally posted by Seitse
Would that get me a curry wurst in Berlin?

Originally posted by Seitse
Yeah, that's what Fox News and the Daily Mail want.

I prefer to bother, thanks.

Wow is this a Eurotrash only thread? 😛

YouTube : PHILOSOPHY - Heidegger

Originally posted by moonbus
things worth bothering about

Originally posted by Seitse
Please provide a list.

Originally posted by moonbus
Top of the list: homeless children.

I don't understand what this means,

present-at-hand can turn to readiness-to-hand without inference

Is there no way to explain it in terms that are easy to grasp?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
I don't understand what this means,

present-at-hand can turn to readiness-to-hand without inference

Is there no way to explain it in terms that are easy to grasp?