Originally posted by coquette that question is direct and to the point falling fall short of the requisite amphogoricality
"So we're engaged here in an exclusive public conversation [anomaly unintended] touching on exquisitely nuanced social observations that meet the unwritten paradigms of 'requisite amphogoricality'?" ~Cynthia Cyberspace (my friends like child anon's Mum call me Cyn)
why only amphigory,why not disambiguation or even quasitransubstantiation which would be more like bread and wine into crackers and beer, far less meaningful than a transformation into a whatever
Originally posted by coquette why only amphigory,why not disambiguation or even quasitransubstantiation which would be more like bread and wine into crackers and beer, far less meaningful than a transformation into a whatever
or a feather nestled in a hammock swaying to the unheard music of a gentle breeze